use cs8416 instead of cs8414 in this design..

[wuffer]

is it possible to use the cs8416 in this design with some modifications??

http://home.tiscali.dk/larsbnil/diagrammer/dac1.jpg
im having problem finding the cs8414 to the right price here but the cs8416 is no problem...

[paologatto]

I have the same question..
The only source of these chips in Italy is Farnell and the CS8414 is priced 14,24 euro, while the CS8416 is priced 6,46 euro.

Are there some problems with the CS8416 or differences with the CS8414?

[gmarsh]

The CS8416 is 3.3V whereas the CS8414 is 5V. 3.3 volts is available already, so that's not a problem.

<personal opinion which means nothing but i'll say it anyway>
The CS841x PLL can introduce a ton of jitter on the recovered clock. I've measured and even heard better performance by using a cheap SRC4190 or AD1895 ASRC and a locally crystal-clocked DAC.
</personal opinion which means nothing but i'll say it anyway>

[Nisbeth]

Originally posted by gmarsh
<personal opinion which means nothing but i'll say it anyway>
The CS841x PLL can introduce a ton of jitter on the recovered clock. I've measured and even heard better performance by using a cheap SRC4190 or AD1895 ASRC and a locally crystal-clocked DAC.
</personal opinion which means nothing but i'll say it anyway>

Side note: Do you have (links to) schematics of such a project?


/U.