Marantz CD63 & CD67 mods list

SimontY said:


Oh yes, there certainly is mate... http://www.hificollective.co.uk/components/black_gate_caps.html

Slightly cheaper anyway eg. 330u/16 Standard is £2.13, £2.48 at Audiocom (both ex. vat).

Enjoy.

Simon


Cheers Simon!

Well you know what they say... opinions are like ar$eholes - everybody has one... so the legendary Thorsten says this... and I'm using LM6172.

It can't be THAT bad surely?!
 
Glenn2 said:
Hi Ray,

Have you ever used audio-cube? They appear to stock Silmic II and Cerafines. I didn't think Cerafines were still being made.

Now I have to choose between Silmic II, Cerafine, BG std, BG FK. It's tempting to stay with a Cerafine/Silmic mix so it stays 'Marantzy' (now there's a new word for you :D).

Hi Glenn,

No, I never bought Elna's new actually. If I read the text in the Silmic section I remember why. Why is it a capacitor suddenly gets a silky sound if we put silk fibers in it?? I'd like to hear one with diamond dust, must be the top, sonically :clown:. Forgive my sarcasm, but I think there's too much marketing cr@p going round here. Plus there's no actual ESR data. That's suspicious too.

Regards,

Ray
 
6h5c said:


Hi Glenn,

No, I never bought Elna's new actually. If I read the text in the Silmic section I remember why. Why is it a capacitor suddenly gets a silky sound if we put silk fibers in it?? I'd like to hear one with diamond dust, must be the top, sonically :clown:. Forgive my sarcasm, but I think there's too much marketing cr@p going round here. Plus there's no actual ESR data. That's suspicious too.

Regards,

Ray

A good point, Ray.

How is it that silver cable always has a 'bell-like' sound.

I bet that if I produced a cable with lead screening (not for the signal), some reviewer would comment on the heavy, leaden sound .

Hype = HugelY inflated PricE

Andy
 
Glenn2 said:



Cheers Simon!

Well you know what they say... opinions are like ar$eholes - everybody has one... so the legendary Thorsten says this... and I'm using LM6172.

It can't be THAT bad surely?!

Interesting. I wonder why he dislikes BGs. I used the LM6172 in my preamp, and it's ok (but coarse and grating to my ears). LM4562 is light years ahead.

Simon
 
SimontY said:


Interesting. I wonder why he dislikes BGs. I used the LM6172 in my preamp, and it's ok (but coarse and grating to my ears). LM4562 is light years ahead.

Simon


I'll re-evaluate op-amps when I put some fresh caps in. I found the 6172 very revealing and it will reveal nasties if they are there rather than smooth them over like the BB stuff tends to... but after extensive mods to the player it sound superb. I found the 4562 rather sterile. Horses for courses! It's all about synergy with other components I suppose, so when I change those I may form a different opinion.

Just got back from the pub after watching my beloved West Ham beat Man Utd so might spend some money to celebrate!

COME ON YOU IRONS!:D
 
Glenn2 said:
It's all about synergy with other components I suppose, so when I change those I may form a different opinion.

Absolutely. I use them in my preamp and 2 x 627 in my CD player. It might be a good mix.

Just been trying to remove the oscillation in my power supplies. I removed the silly 82n and 33n caps I'd put in, leaving just 1u for bypass at the psu end. Even after a couple of tracks, when I pause, there is no whine, and noise is fairly low. I think this has cracked it. :D

Simon
 
SimontY said:
Just been trying to remove the oscillation in my power supplies. I removed the silly 82n and 33n caps I'd put in, leaving just 1u for bypass at the psu end. Even after a couple of tracks, when I pause, there is no whine, and noise is fairly low. I think this has cracked it. :D
Simon

Good news!

Were those caps on the regulator output? Some regs don't like low ESR caps right on their outputs and will oscillate. LM317 can do this it seems. The output inductance creates a resonance with the cap. Should not be a problem with 78xx I think. Something to consider.

Also, most regulators need >10mA output current to work properly. If one is feeding, say, the DACs analogue stage or clock gates they only draw a few mA so you need to strap a <500R resistor across the reg's output.
 
Glenn2 said:
Good news!

Were those caps on the regulator output? Some regs don't like low ESR caps right on their outputs and will oscillate. LM317 can do this it seems. The output inductance creates a resonance with the cap. Should not be a problem with 78xx I think. Something to consider.

Also, most regulators need >10mA output current to work properly. If one is feeding, say, the DACs analogue stage or clock gates they only draw a few mA so you need to strap a <500R resistor across the reg's output.

Interesting thoughts... The caps were on the psu boards before the regulator boards. The regs are not feeding any big, low ESR caps. The regs are Audiocom super regs.

One reg feeds the clock divider chip (can't be many mA) and the other the Audiocom clock (also can't be many mA).

Perhaps the inductance of the umbilical wiring (1m+ including wire inside the CD) is playing with the caps in the power supply.

Some oscillation kicked in eventually, but it's much less severe than before, and it took about 10mins to start! So further refinements are needed ;)

Simon
 
Just where are your regs mounted w.r.t the loads they feed Simon? If you have them some distance away, then that could do it. Also, with anything less than the minimum distance you can arrange between the regs ground reference and the loads 0v pin, you're not getting the regulation you've paid for!

There's a lot to be said for sticking a largish, low quality (high -esr) cap at the output of a 3-pin reg (10-100uF), to damp any tendency to oscillate:
http://www.tnt-audio.com/clinica/regulators2_impedance1_e.html
 
martin clark said:
Just where are your regs mounted w.r.t the loads they feed Simon? If you have them some distance away, then that could do it. Also, with anything less than the minimum distance you can arrange between the regs ground reference and the loads 0v pin, you're not getting the regulation you've paid for!

There's a lot to be said for sticking a largish, low quality (high -esr) cap at the output of a 3-pin reg (10-100uF), to damp any tendency to oscillate:
http://www.tnt-audio.com/clinica/regulators2_impedance1_e.html

Hi Martin,

The regs are fairly close to the ccts they feed, just a few cm of wiring away. There's room for improvement though, I'm looking at getting them even better connected.

It would seem to me that the part of the circuit before the regs is oscillating, not the actual regs. I do not really know! I'd like to make it better.

Simon
 
Malefoda said:
For those who want to konw how much work has to be according to Ray's list, even if many parts are missing ( some removed caps, you'll have to add some surface caps to bypass some other and more... ).

And merry Xmas folks !!

Looks familiar :D

Ray
 

Attachments

  • cd57_parts_exit.jpg
    cd57_parts_exit.jpg
    95 KB · Views: 317
markk02474 said:
Marcus,

From your picture I see a couple things:
1. You didn't jumper the resistors powering the opamps. Its good to do, perhaps after listening with the HDAM removed so you can hear each difference.
2. I don't see a wire to carry the signal around the HDAM. I hope it is on the underside.

Hi Mark,

I have jumper the power resistors and also replace the ecaps at that area with some cerafines470uf/25v. The opamps, Lm4562 have arrived and are now working very well in my cdp.

I have also removed the caps btw the HDAM though it might not be relevant to do so. Is there any other thing that i need to jumper but miss out?

I am thinking of removing the headphone out next followed by some ecaps replacing in the DAC area and the clock hack mentioned in the accoustica.org (but i am quite unsure about what its saying)

What do you guys think will reap the most improvement and i should try out?

Regards,
Marcus
 
marcusdeming said:


Hi Ray,

I see that alot of the orange colour bobs are removed. Are they the ones that are at the opamps area? What can we expect from removing them?

Those orange ones are ceramic. They do not belong in the signal path. Replace with silvered mica, polystyrene, teflon or polypropylene. You can expect a big improvement lol

If yours is SE or KI you won't have those in the output filter, they'll be mylar.

Simon
 
SimontY said:

It would seem to me that the part of the circuit before the regs is oscillating, not the actual regs. I do not really know! I'd like to make it better.

Hi Simon,

Are you pre-regulating at all?

Also, I've heard that the Audiocom super-regs are not unconditionally stable.

Do you have any capacitance at their inputs?
Also, sometimes we need that few cm of PCB track to dampen the reg's ouput. It's a minefield mate!

Martin will probably correct me (hope so anyway) but I think the input cap on a reg can be as low ESR as you like, and the cap bypassing the load device also can also be, with the caveat that the damping is provided in-between by the PCB track, and the cap on the reg's output is not too low ESR to cause ringing or oscillation.

LM317s can do this though I think you have to be quite unlucky, and I think low-dropout (LDO) regs are prone too, as are some super-reg designs (with remote sensing of load ground).

I think the bog-standard 78xx is only likely to oscillate with if your bypass caps are too high ESR (but not sure about that).

Are they all Audiocom jobbies or do you have others?

Also, could your noises be caused by ground loops?

I think there should be a simple solution to this....