|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#9601 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
Fave. threads: Marantz CD63 | Philips CD650 | my 3-way dipoles | T-bass for dipoles | EnABL treatment | Arcam Alpha (CD) |
|
|
|
|
|
#9602 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
What? Worked all this time and waste money and a CD6002 can beat my player?
I should have found one used then :'( I just have to hope my CD53 does better a little... but last time we said as it is it can face without shame a stock Naim CD5i!? I'm lost. My CD53 with few mods (as I remember maybe some caps and/bypass wire... maybe AD8620) was very close to my Philips DVP5500S, wich is a magazine awarded CDP.
__________________
Old simple TT, cheap CDP with wise mods, Class T amp at its best: music! |
|
|
|
|
#9603 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Your modded player will better the CD6002, don't worry!
Remember the old Marantz models were all well reviewed 10+ years ago too. My CD63KI (with all mods) was competing nicely vs. a £1300 Naim with some mods. So bear in mind it's what you do with it that counts... Simon
__________________
Fave. threads: Marantz CD63 | Philips CD650 | my 3-way dipoles | T-bass for dipoles | EnABL treatment | Arcam Alpha (CD) |
|
|
|
|
#9604 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Doncaster England
|
And mine competes with £2500+ cd players, some people say more. Any player modded sounds an hell of alot better than stock.
The cd6002 is a superb cd player for the money, better in most areas than the 63KI in stock form. Add a clock some nice caps , better opamps and a nice reg or two and there is only one winner. Brent |
|
|
|
|
#9605 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
No op-amps there!
__________________
Fave. threads: Marantz CD63 | Philips CD650 | my 3-way dipoles | T-bass for dipoles | EnABL treatment | Arcam Alpha (CD) |
|
|
|
|
#9606 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Doncaster England
|
Nope and added a few more bits and bobs
Brent |
|
|
|
|
#9607 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
I'm skeptical as to whether these cd63's can be beaten at all, really.
I read somewhere that there's a few ultra high-end players that use this dac chip. I would love to compare my player with an expensive stock model. My mate has heard all-sorts over the years and he's never heard a player that even comes close to mine. And Brent's is even better. Lee. 16 bit players only here, lol
__________________
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ |
|
|
|
|
#9608 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
We heard a Naim one (£7k or so I think) in a shop that did the sorts of things Brents does, but it wasn't quite as refined I don't think. I think the Naim amps were good though.
Simon
__________________
Fave. threads: Marantz CD63 | Philips CD650 | my 3-way dipoles | T-bass for dipoles | EnABL treatment | Arcam Alpha (CD) |
|
|
|
|
#9609 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Doncaster England
|
Simon are you saying mine was more refined or the Naim (£7K with the PSU)?
Please say mine please say mine Brent |
|
|
|
|
#9610 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
It's hard to say due to the systems and room being different but I thought the Naim was digging up the same detail as yours, but probably not the same sweetness and smoothness as your CD63.
Simon
__________________
Fave. threads: Marantz CD63 | Philips CD650 | my 3-way dipoles | T-bass for dipoles | EnABL treatment | Arcam Alpha (CD) |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (2 members and 1 guests) | |
| thierry67 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.22377 seconds (63.11% PHP - 36.89% MySQL) with 11 queries |