|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#61 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Doncaster England
|
Why thank you Simon
I think these should be called Dogs bollocks. hehe Yep I will bypass them with 10uF blackgates and 0.1uF polypropylene. I now have 4 top mods pending... can't wait. Hopefully early next week all the bits will be here
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Doncaster England
|
OK they were cheap anyway lol
Would you not recommend something better than the OPA132, it is very cheap to buy and dont mind spending more. I will be using OPA627 for ic1 |
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Doncaster England
|
My brain hurts lol
|
|
|
|
|
#64 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Montreal
|
Quote:
BTW, everybody raves about the OPA627s even thought the AD8610s look better on paper. Has anybody compared the two back to back? -I'm using the AD8620 (dual 8610) from Brown Dog in my Rotel RCD 02 and I'm quite happy with them. mattgwood(at)yahoo(d0t)ca
__________________
I have the ears of Horrowitz and the mind of a dog!! ...er |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | ||
|
One Seriously Addicted to Audio and Electronics
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
Why is the OPA132 not good enough, is it because it's not expensive enough?? Have you ever considered listening to it first? Ray. |
||
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Doncaster England
|
I have the sevice manual but wouldnt mind it in pdf format
|
|
|
|
|
#67 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
He is using 2134, so yes, it has been done. I have used 2132 for a while and assessed it over many months. Then I moved to 627bp, and it is another league entirely. If you cannot hear this clearly you may need to upgrade speakers, amps, cabling, room, supports, mains etc. edit: I misread OPA132 as OPA2132, so I'll go back to sleep now :-/ For sure, several combinations should be tried, unless they're insanely expensive.
__________________
Fave. threads: Marantz CD63 | Philips CD650 | my 3-way dipoles | T-bass for dipoles | EnABL treatment | Arcam Alpha (CD) |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 | |
|
One Seriously Addicted to Audio and Electronics
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Hi Matt, I agree. I think it's because the OPA627 has an 'audiophile' status of some kind. I compared it with AD8610, OPA124, OPA227.... see list. And the winner was not the OPA627. It sounds not as clear and detailed as others. Regards, Ray. |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Doncaster England
|
6h5c..
I was only enquiring if there was better for more money incase you thought I did'nt want to spend much The super regs you see on my picture were only £16 each off ebay and they were the perfect size to fit between the big caps. My brain hurts knowing which op amps to settle on. I know all of them are going to be good, and the Browndog pcb with 627 on will be better than my opa2134. Anyway I have bought some opa132. You seem to like them so ill give it a go Thanks |
|
|
|
|
#70 | |
|
One Seriously Addicted to Audio and Electronics
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
No offense meant. Should have posted an extra But i'm a bit sceptic towards Audiocom stuff. Regards, Ray. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (2 members and 1 guests) | |
| thierry67 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.19166 seconds (59.06% PHP - 40.94% MySQL) with 11 queries |