|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#561 | |
|
One Seriously Addicted to Audio and Electronics
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
I've done that already, the DAC's outputs show a nice square wave After that, a 1kHz sinewave on a test cd gets clearer and clearer after the first stages of passive filtering. The first opamp is supposed to subtract both signals, but at it's inputs, the two waves seem to be in phase (???). There's still too much HF at this point to discover any noise (on my simple 20MHz scope that is... ).Ray. |
|
|
|
|
|
#562 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Doncaster England
|
I am changing every thing in the HF amp tomorrow with nice parts and then the RF later in week.
Has anyone thought about changing the xtal on the servo or is this a waste of time? |
|
|
|
|
#563 | |
|
One Seriously Addicted to Audio and Electronics
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
The tubestage sounds great, but it also has a few minor disadvantages. The amplification is low (1x), and since the signal is divided by the passive filter, the output is not all that. I'm going to see if I can solve that by using a long-tailed diff. input stage with a low-mu tube. Then I can sum the input signals also. The tubes are not in series then, so B+ can be lower. If I use one with low Ri then the output impedance should be low enough so I won't need a kathode follower buffer. I already tried with a ECC82 (I simply modified the exsisting circuit) and got a HUGE output. It needs some tweaking Regards, Ray. |
|
|
|
|
|
#564 | |
|
Magneto the Gravity Man
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Hi Ray. So now you have something similar to mine but without the cascode??? Andy PS I read, in one of the many articles on modding the '63, that it is VERY important to have matched components after the dac to give a balance. Of course, any imbalance would give rise to residual noise. |
|
|
|
|
|
#565 | |
|
One Seriously Addicted to Audio and Electronics
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Like your pictures! You did a nice job on the PSU. In my 67 the servo/decoder is one chip fed from the DAC clock, so that's that for me If the PSU around the 63's servo is improved it may have a positive effect since less noise will be present in the player. Ray. |
|
|
|
|
|
#566 | |
|
Magneto the Gravity Man
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Andy |
|
|
|
|
|
#567 | ||
|
One Seriously Addicted to Audio and Electronics
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
Regards, Ray. |
||
|
|
|
|
#568 | |
|
Magneto the Gravity Man
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Sorry, I cannot be of help in that respect right now!! I have just started to rip the audio stages off my board in preparation for the tube stage. I am also rewiring the redundant +-12v opamp supply to give +12v only as a preregulator for +5v. Andy |
|
|
|
|
|
#569 |
|
One Seriously Addicted to Audio and Electronics
diyAudio Member
|
Ah, good luck with that. Didn't do that yet. There's enough possibilities to mount Thorsten's filter on the PCB, using the original holes and traces. It will be nicely close to the DAC.
I was hoping to use the 12V for heater supply Anybody heard from Michael yet, regarding our custom toroid? Hey Michael, how are you Regards, Ray. |
|
|
|
|
#570 | |
|
Magneto the Gravity Man
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Windings are centre-tapped except, maybe, the KI. It may be possible by removing the TX and checking out the wiring but I would not think so. Andy |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (2 members and 1 guests) | |
| thierry67 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.25504 seconds (66.50% PHP - 33.50% MySQL) with 11 queries |