|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
...still looking for the holy grail. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Coventry,England
|
Its good to see this topic again
I've been meaning to bypass the HDAMs for ages; it seems a totally unnecessary waste of parts when the opamps will drive headphones! It may be worth adding an 18 volt supply just for the opamps at the samr time - apparently they like the higher voltage and it would increase their output capability I'll also confirm (IMO) the 627s easily better the 2132/2134s.
__________________
I w isH i cuold typpe bettr |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Coventry,England
|
Another thought; has anyone done a reality check; modded cd63 against a modern decent player?
I haven't and it does nag at me that I might be wasting my time..
__________________
I w isH i cuold typpe bettr |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Chicago
|
Would these mods work the same on the cd-53?
__________________
http://www.caraudioconnoisseur.com/ |
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Coventry,England
|
Quote:
AS far as I know, the cd53 doesn't have HDAMs, so you're off to a flying start I'd guess this makes the opamps even more important, so get some good ones in pronto! i'd say all the usual mods should work just the same.
__________________
I w isH i cuold typpe bettr |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | ||
|
One Seriously Addicted to Audio and Electronics
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
I buy cheap broken CD57's for a scratch, and then mod them for about 150-200 euro's. They blow away a lot of expensive players. Always like the looks on peoples faces when I press play on 'an old CD57'.... |
||
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
...still looking for the holy grail. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Doncaster England
|
Yes CD53 is easily modded, the only difference between it and the 63 is the HDAM and a few features.
The only problem with the 53/63 is when you dont want to heavily mod the player....what I mean is the 63SE has alot of uprated components so is already 'modded' by marantz and will benefit a few good choice mods like the op amps , some bypassing and a few caps like Blackgates. If you are going to eventually change most caps and resistors to higher spec items then you may as well start off with the 53/63. Best to practice on your player and if the time arrives buy a KI off ebay and do a component swap to it. The KI benefits from the SE caps etc + copper chassis and a toroidal transormer. |
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I have the schematics of this player and it seems that the hdam is a discreet shielded buffer using highly desirable jfets!
Ive read diyers on these threads talk about adding discrete buffers to increase performance and now that a manufacturer has gone to the trouble of giving us one it sounds better without Could it be that it sounds different and to some tastes its better? regards arthur |
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Doncaster England
|
I have not bypassed mine yet, but I will be to see the differences.
The other thing to do is possibly upgrade the components in the HDAM. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.21572 seconds (57.31% PHP - 42.69% MySQL) with 11 queries |