|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bochum,Germany
|
Quote:
Dear Mr.Fumihiko san, Konnichiwa Do you have a diagramm? Sincerely,A
__________________
Sleep of sanity create monsters |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: japan
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bochum,Germany
|
Quote:
__________________
Sleep of sanity create monsters |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Munich
|
Quote:
And digital lines. And grounds. And supply rails. Or give one extra supply each chip. But not individual (decoupling) pins. This is why TDA1541 can not be stacked. Lots of individual decoupling pins. All must be placed on the pcb. TDA1543 can be stacked. Very simple "tcheap". |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: japan
|
AnthonyAsh san KONNICHIWA
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
|
Fumihiko san Konnichiwa
Thanks for the pictures. Just a couple of questions: 1. Did you connect Pin 5 of the upper and lower chips together, i.e. are they in parallel like pin 18? 2. Did you connect Pin 1 to the -V supply via its own independant capacitor? Finally, vs the single chip, what are the sonic benefits of going with the parallel setup? Thanks Ryan |
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: japan
|
Dear Dr.H san
Quote:
pin1 to -V supply via own independent capacitor. pin3 and 4, via own independent capacitor
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
|
Fumihiko san,
Thanks! What would you describe as the benefits of using the parallel chips vs just using one chip? I will try the mod sometime in the near future and post my results here. Thanks for your input! Ryan |
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bochum,Germany
|
Quote:
For me is also very interesting what you gain when you used your pcm63 config?
__________________
Sleep of sanity create monsters |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: japan
|
Dear
what a difference ,single DAC and multiple DAC? single use , it is thin sound dual , what a different? triple , good sound! quad , I was surprised 8 paralelled , had been moved! I heard and compared, accuphase DC-91 just a little difference. I think,best solution is 4 to 8 paralleled DAC actually, accuphase paralleled 4 to 8. now I try 4 paralled CS4334 |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CS8412CP, DF1704E, PCM1704UK, PCM63PK SM5842AP/APT etc | xaudiox | Vendor's Bazaar | 7 | 23rd December 2008 12:31 PM |
| PHILIPS I2S to PCM63PK | robo | Digital Source | 8 | 4th October 2008 07:49 AM |
| piggy-back op-amps | amc32 | Car Audio | 6 | 14th July 2008 08:48 AM |
| TDA1545 – possible to piggy back? | jnewbold | Digital Line Level | 17 | 19th December 2007 05:47 PM |
| parasound dac 1500 piggy back | jamone | Digital Source | 0 | 19th February 2006 02:48 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13336 seconds (83.88% PHP - 16.12% MySQL) with 11 queries |