Large Distance Optical isolation for DAC. - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Source

Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 20th July 2002, 12:38 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Default Large Distance Optical isolation for DAC.

I want to optically isolate my digital section from the analog section by 2 inches.

I'll need 12 megabit for the stereo 192KHz, 24 bits. 2 Channels up(L/R & data), 1 channel down(clk). (using the CS43122 in I2S mode)

What's the cheapest way to optically TX 12 megabits? I've found Photo Pin diodes @ 25 cents which can do 40MHz easily, but most IR leds die at 1MHz. HP has a HEMT IR led which runs up to 15 MHz, but I do not want to rely only on HP for my IR transmitters.


(When I say cheap, I mean under 2$...)
__________________
_______
Brian
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st July 2002, 12:15 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Germany
Default Don't do it...

unless the oscillator sits right next to the DAC without any optical insulation.

Reason: there is no optical link (at least accessible to most DYIers) that has sufficient bandwidth to transmit a clock signal without adding a significant amount of jitter.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st July 2002, 01:47 PM   #3
hifiZen is offline hifiZen  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
hifiZen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mountain View, CA
If you want to isolate the two sections from each other's electrical noise, you may want to try differential transmitters and receivers (maybe some ECL logic parts?)... you can send the data streams down twisted pairs. That way you can achieve good timing without direct ground coupling. The differences between the ground potential of your two boards (caused by their relative separation and, presumably, single ground connection through a star-ground point) will not matter to the logic timing if there is sufficient CMRR at the receiving end. You may also want to consider the ISO-150.

Personally, I don't think it's really worth all the effort if the digital and analogue circuits are both resident in the same enclosure. In this case, it is my preference to put both circuits on a single PCB, with one continuous ground plane. This seems to go against much of the popular views on the subject, but it works... If you are careful in how you do your layout, you can make the quietest and most digital-noise-immune analogue circuit this way. The key is all in controlling ground return paths and EM noise radiating elements (eg ground plane splits). You must exercise careful layout, and decoupling of the digital ICs becomes extremely important. It's all about ground return paths at LF and HF, which are dealt with separately.

There was a good paper written about all this on the Audio Crafter's Guild website... anyone know wher ethis paper can still be found online?
__________________
- Chad.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st July 2002, 02:32 PM   #4
sonnya is offline sonnya  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
sonnya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Denmark
High Bandwidth in opto isolator => low life span

Sonny
  Reply With Quote
Old 22nd July 2002, 07:09 PM   #5
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: As far from the NOSsers as possible
You are fixing to go to a lot of effort for very little improvement. In fact, do it wrong, and it will be worse. All of the suggestions above are good, but I'm not fond of the ISO-150.

Jocko
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2002, 07:24 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
--------------------
Don't do it...
unless the oscillator sits right next to the DAC without any optical insulation.
-------------------
capslock

Yes, the clock is on the DAC board. This is why I said there were 2 signals comming in (L/R) & data bits, and 1 going out (clock feeding back to digital side).


-------------------
If you want to isolate the two sections from each other's electrical noise, you may want to try differential transmitters and receivers (maybe some ECL logic parts?)... you can send the data streams down twisted pairs.
-------------------
Chad.

The ECL idea is good, except I'm trying to isolate everything, including RF & electrostatic. These guys will make it through the ECL, & any optocoupler & through data isolation transformers. If you want to know what kind of stuff this does to analog circuits, it's a different & new topic.

------------------
Personally, I don't think it's really worth all the effort if the digital and analogue circuits are both resident in the same enclosure.
------------------

Both sections are on different PCBs. They will both be coated with tuner stablant, the digital side will have a secondary coating of RF shielding epoxy resin, & to top it all off, both sections will be in their own double sided shielded compartment. (Like the ones on tuners.)

-------------------
You are fixing to go to a lot of effort for very little improvement. In fact, do it wrong, and it will be worse. All of the suggestions above are good, but I'm not fond of the ISO-150.
-------------------
Jocko

True. I'm making the extra effort to completely isolate everything. The idea here is that this USB2.0 6 channel sound card with built in analog pre-amp attenuator would not be affected by the fact that the PC equiptment is on 1 set of outlets from the fuse box, &, the analod side is conected directly to 3 PassLabs X350 amps, which are on a different line from the fuse box. Even though my USB sound card feeds will be balanced, the CMR of the Pass Labs amps is only -80db.

The idea here is to even better isolate the 2 sides than what would be possible with any AC 120v isolation transformers. Just that lousy ground pin alone from 1 outlet in my house to another reads between 2-8 vac, with ridiculous RF in it. This is due to my proximity to those mega huge power transmition lines & 2 AM radio station broadcaster antennas.
__________________
_______
Brian
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2002, 09:19 AM   #7
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: As far from the NOSsers as possible
Quote:
Even though my USB sound card feeds will be balanced, the CMR of the Pass Labs amps is only -80db.
Yeah, and at what frequency??? And how is all this going to solve the problem of those AM transmitters?

Jocko
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2002, 04:09 AM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
The AM interference is being created by the huge ground loop created by the wiring in the house. If I run my PC equipment from the same fuse line, the problem disappears. But, I am still left with lousy sound card performance.

One of my choices was to get a sound card with optical out only, &, on the AV side, get dedicated optical D/A converters with built in pre-amps, or D/A converter with a separate pre-amp. The prices here would be ridiculously out of my budget.


Here is how I plan to solve my problem with my home-made USB sound card:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The digital side is powered by the USB from the computer. It has a 16 Megabyte cache and only works at 192Khz x 24 bit by 8 channels.

So far, I am over the USB current limit by 190ma, Iím thinking of just cheating here.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The analog side has it's own 25+25v toroid for the analog & another 9v toroid for the digital parts of the DACs & reference crystal oscillator.

I'm using 4 Crystal CS43122 chips.

I'm still investigating the best I/V converter to use.

For the attenuation, I'm in the middle of figuring out the bets way to do it. Dual vactrols have caught my interest in that they supposedly behave exactly like a normal resistor without the mechanical noise & decay of a pot.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

My friend, Mike, has agreed to make the drivers & SACD/CD/MP3 player for the project in trade for 1 unit. Sample rate conversion will be done by CPU. Not counting the analog I/V converters & attenuation, the project is currently at just around 180$, including professional PCB.

Iím also thinking of making the plans public here at diyAudio. But, unless, anyone here has an Altera Quartus license, they may not be able to program the boot prom. All the rest of the components should be easy enough to get.
__________________
_______
Brian
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2002, 04:24 AM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Correction with the Altera boot prom:

If I'll add the optional parallel port buffer needed for programming. It's just a 74LS245 & resistors.

Altera has a web/free download version of Quartus which will allow programming of the boot prom.
__________________
_______
Brian
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2002, 08:30 AM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Use laser diodes. They can transfer faster than 22 gigabits per second (about 2 terrabytes per second). Then use a very fast phototransistor.

USB version 1.0 will not give you 12 megabits. It is about 6 megabits. Use either USB version 2.0 or Firewire (IEE-1394).
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: Large inductors, Large Ports, and Leaky Holes luvdunhill Swap Meet 10 6th March 2009 04:01 PM
optical isolation transformer for audio kambule Everything Else 8 29th November 2006 09:56 AM
mains isolation distance on PCB Kram Everything Else 13 11th March 2005 06:48 PM
Tube Optical-Isolation Unit jackinnj Tubes / Valves 5 17th September 2004 02:45 AM
How loud, in SPL, is fff from a large orchestra at front row distance? 454Casull Multi-Way 8 23rd July 2004 08:57 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:50 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2