|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
|
I just finished reading Clark Johnsen's Positive Feedback article titled "The Biggest News You May Ever Read (About Audio)." In it, Johnsen discusses a method of re-recording CDs developed or discovered by a fellow, George Louis, operating under the guise of a company called Digital Systems & Solutions. The re-recording, using Louis' "alogorithm codes," evidently improves the sound of an original cd, and as Johnsen would have it by not a subtle degree. Johnsen calls the improvement "the most astonishing single improvement in sound I have ever experienced." He also suggests the process elicits "master tape-type quality from Redbook CDs."
Has anyone any experience with what Johnsen is talking about? Investigating his claims will be easy enough, which I plan myself to do. I'm wondering if anyone has a sense of what might be at play in Louis' re-recording process. Comments anyone?
__________________
Tom |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Wroclaw
|
Very interesting , thanks for the links
![]() I don't see much interest in this topic so far. I remember reading some year ago about some guy who made the research on JITTER topic. He realeted that under some circumstances the Jitter can be canceled from the original CD copying it a number of times. He claimed that for every CD there is optimal number of copies (copy from the copy...etc) that has to be made to cancel the jitter totally and release the true sound of the original recording. Bartek |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New York
|
zygibajt,
Do you still have the article around? |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
|
I have one copied CD in my possession. It has a very noisy eye-pattern and sounds more "digital" than the original. (The eye-pattern is the signal coming from the laserhead before it is processed in the player making it "bits" again.)
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
|
Elso, on what machine was the disk copied?
__________________
Tom |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Eugene, OR
|
More snake oil?
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
|
Quote:
__________________
Tom |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Halifax, NS, Canada
|
I guess this machine applies a green pen in the digital domain.
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Banned
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Germany
|
Someone still has to explain to me that "jitter on the CD" thing (as opposed to "jitter at the DAC in the CD player") and how it affects sound quality.
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The world`s most perfect sound system | destroyer X | Solid State | 32 | 8th August 2006 09:06 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09591 seconds (76.95% PHP - 23.05% MySQL) with 10 queries |