|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Limoges, France
|
I'm a little bit puzzled regarding the values of the DIR1701's loop filter parts. Data sheet (page 16) gives 6K8, 0.022uf (22nF) and 0.0022uF (2.2nF), while the Demo board data sheet (page 3) replaces the 2.2nF with a 220pF. Which one is the right one (I think it's 2n2, but...) ?
By the way, has anybody tweaked those values, as it has been done for the CS8412/14 here ? Any equations ? Thanks
__________________
François "Learning French is trivial: the word for horse is cheval, and everything else follows in the same way." |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
|
Francios,
I built a 1701 reciever with 22nf and 2.2nf, worked fine. Did not try 220pF, but that sounds low. Have you looked at the 1703 datasheet? (68nF and 8.2nF I believe) Different values in the loop filter, and the transfer function corner starts at a much higher frequency. Since starting rejection at a lower frequency seems great, I didn't give much more thought to the issue, other than to wonder if the 1701 loop values could be used on a 1703. Tweaking is definitely an interesting notion--I'd like to hear responses on that. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Limoges, France
|
Thanks Tiroth,
Yes, I was prepared to go with 2.2nF, so let's go. An almost recurrent problem with TI's datasheet for digital products is that they often provide only "surface" informations. Well, one can contact TI... I've done that five or six times, never receiving a reply , thus I've given up... AD and Crystal are more DIY-friendly And yes, I've also wondered if the 1703's values were usable with the 1701, and vice-versa. But let's hear about tweaks...
__________________
François "Learning French is trivial: the word for horse is cheval, and everything else follows in the same way." |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
|
I actually got a response from TI re the 1703 datasheet, which I think is amazingly confusing unless you cross-reference the 1701 datasheet and make some assumptions to boot.
Luckily swapping SMD capacitors for loop tweaking is pretty painless
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Hafler 9130 feedback loop MOD question | reiver | Solid State | 3 | 5th June 2008 02:34 AM |
| Loop gain question | lumanauw | Solid State | 55 | 16th December 2005 09:59 PM |
| PLL 3rd Order Passive Loop Filter, calculation arguments | cathode_leak | Digital Source | 0 | 24th February 2005 12:50 PM |
| Question about output stage used in open loop | Banfi T. | Solid State | 31 | 4th May 2004 03:21 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |