LP, CD, SACD and DVD-A again - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Source

Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 19th August 2004, 04:39 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Default LP, CD, SACD and DVD-A again

http://www.digit-life.com/articles2/...d-a/index.html
Some interesting information about formats. In addition, some researches about audibility of hypersonic images are here http://jn.physiology.org/cgi/content/abstract/83/6/3548
The full article in pdf file is there as well.
Plus some pictures:
Here is the analog noise floor comparison for dithered and noise-shapped modern CD vs SACD: http://members.cox.net/alex_lat/Test...SACD_noise.PNG
Here is the switching of SACD modes (one is -100dB S/N , till 100kHz FR and another one is 20Hz-20kHz mode, -120dB S/N)
http://members.cox.net/alex_lat/Tests/SACD_modes.PNG
Switching is performed in DSD decoder CXD2753, used in almost all SACD players. In some players, such as Denon A11 or top Sony ones, it can be done manually. http://members.cox.net/alex_lat/Tests/RFSACD.PNG
  Reply With Quote
Old 19th August 2004, 02:36 PM   #2
Cameron is offline Cameron  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Saint Louis
Great articles! Especially the first one. Answered some of my more technical questions. I think it is interesting though not suprising to see that SACD is outselling DVD-A by a factor of 3.25. That camp has so many more titles available. The main thing I don't understand is: If they really want either format to catch on, why don't they offer us some decent music choices?

Here is a comparison breakdown as I see it:

DVD-A
---------------------------
- where is the freaking music?
+ better overall performance
+ consistent resolution across audio band
- authoring is very complicated
+ authoring software is available though expensive
+ easy to process with DSP or software
- never seen a 192/24 recording anywhere
- many transfers only 48/24, so why bother?
+ just recently playable in a very few computers
- video not necessary, but recommended for navigation
- designed by commitee, aka a cluster ******

SACD
----------------------------
+ better but still incredibly poor variety of music
+ better low frequency resolution
- poor high frequency resolution
- much higher digital noise near audio frequencies
+ supposedly easier to author
- no authoring software available
- very difficult to process via DSP or software
- not playable in computers
+ no video needed
+ singular design vision though way too proprietary

In my opinion, there are more than sufficient negatives for both formats to keep them from becoming widespread.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SACD over S/PDIF Iain McNeill Digital Line Level 4 1st September 2008 05:27 AM
ps3 and SACD troyhenson Digital Source 3 15th October 2007 04:26 PM
Pioneer DV-575 DVD SACD DAC ?!?!?! promitheus Digital Source 4 30th June 2005 11:33 AM
SACD's on a computer MbayAQ Music 4 15th July 2003 06:30 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:08 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2