|Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc.|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
||Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|19th August 2004, 05:39 AM||#1|
Join Date: Apr 2004
LP, CD, SACD and DVD-A again
Some interesting information about formats. In addition, some researches about audibility of hypersonic images are here http://jn.physiology.org/cgi/content/abstract/83/6/3548
The full article in pdf file is there as well.
Plus some pictures:
Here is the analog noise floor comparison for dithered and noise-shapped modern CD vs SACD: http://members.cox.net/alex_lat/Test...SACD_noise.PNG
Here is the switching of SACD modes (one is -100dB S/N , till 100kHz FR and another one is 20Hz-20kHz mode, -120dB S/N)
Switching is performed in DSD decoder CXD2753, used in almost all SACD players. In some players, such as Denon A11 or top Sony ones, it can be done manually. http://members.cox.net/alex_lat/Tests/RFSACD.PNG
|19th August 2004, 03:36 PM||#2|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Saint Louis
Great articles! Especially the first one. Answered some of my more technical questions. I think it is interesting though not suprising to see that SACD is outselling DVD-A by a factor of 3.25. That camp has so many more titles available. The main thing I don't understand is: If they really want either format to catch on, why don't they offer us some decent music choices?
Here is a comparison breakdown as I see it:
- where is the freaking music?
+ better overall performance
+ consistent resolution across audio band
- authoring is very complicated
+ authoring software is available though expensive
+ easy to process with DSP or software
- never seen a 192/24 recording anywhere
- many transfers only 48/24, so why bother?
+ just recently playable in a very few computers
- video not necessary, but recommended for navigation
- designed by commitee, aka a cluster ******
+ better but still incredibly poor variety of music
+ better low frequency resolution
- poor high frequency resolution
- much higher digital noise near audio frequencies
+ supposedly easier to author
- no authoring software available
- very difficult to process via DSP or software
- not playable in computers
+ no video needed
+ singular design vision though way too proprietary
In my opinion, there are more than sufficient negatives for both formats to keep them from becoming widespread.
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|SACD over S/PDIF||Iain McNeill||Digital Line Level||4||1st September 2008 06:27 AM|
|ps3 and SACD||troyhenson||Digital Source||3||15th October 2007 05:26 PM|
|Pioneer DV-575 DVD SACD DAC ?!?!?!||promitheus||Digital Source||4||30th June 2005 12:33 PM|
|SACD's on a computer||MbayAQ||Music||4||15th July 2003 07:30 PM|
|New To Site?||Need Help?|