|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New York
|
Looking at SMD clock crystals, they seemed to be spec'ed in "parts per million." How does this translate into picoseconds of jitter? Does anyone have a good off-the-rack SMD clock to recommend?
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: USA
|
"ppm" is almost always the long term drift accuracy spec.
Sometimes the nominal frequency accuracy is spec'ed in ppm. This has little or nothing to do with jitter (related to phase noise which is a more useful spec). Many grunt clock oscillators don't spec phase noise and/or jitter.
__________________
bel |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: As far from the NOSsers as possible
|
There is no relationship, at all, between accuracy (ppm) and jitter.
Anyone who tells you there is doesn't know squat about oscillators. About jitter specs........of clocks........(crystals don't have "jitter" specs.) They are often times misleading, as they always seem to neglect the frequency range of the jitter. Although close-in jitter is probably the most important, and would most likely be part of any jitter spec. But don't count on it. Are you asking about crystals or clocks??? Jocko |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06311 seconds (71.13% PHP - 28.87% MySQL) with 9 queries |