|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: KK
|
Hi eweryone!
I'm new here and I have a question. I wuld like to bypass the output stage and replace it with a tube. Where wuld it be best to take the signal from? If anyone has done that I wuld apriciate the help. Sorry for my english, it's a bit russty Robi |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: -
|
__________________
Regards Fin |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: KK
|
Hi Fin
Thanks for the link. Usefull reading. But not quite what i was looking for. Really nobody has bone taht before? Or should I ask this in the tube forum? Robi |
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Previously: Kuei Yang Wang
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Somewhere nice on planet earth
|
Konnichiwa,
Quote:
One option would be to sum the various signals using a classic resistor mixer into a low impedance load and then to bring up the signal back to sensible levels. This could be done without ever bothering to convert balanced to SE. Another option would be to use a pair of transformers to convert the signal from balanced to SE and by seriesing the secondaries to "mix" the signal from the two DAC channels per Audio Channel. All in all the 6000 is not terribly well suited to that kind of stuff.... Sayonara |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: KK
|
Hi,
I've managed to bypass the output stage. Thanks to everyone who tryed to help me. If you would like to do it too and dont know how feel free to contact me Robi |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: -
|
What did you end up doing?
__________________
Regards Fin |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: KK
|
It really is simple. I took four resistors of 10k and mede a resistor summer (I hope you understaind what I mean). First I conected one on pin 11 at the output of HDAM and the other resistor to pin 9. It's written +L and -L. And then conect the free ends of the resistors together- that's allready your output.
But the problem with this was that the right chanel (I think) was playing louder than the left. It's because the resistors 3211 and 3217 were mounted on the HDAM befor the conector 1212 and on the other chanel they were after. So I took the signal from each side of the capacitors 2211 and 2212. Now the chanels are equally loud. Now I'm thinking to bypass it infront of the HDAM. But I'm afraid that simple resistors won't doo since the signal is choped in four chanels +L1, -L1, -L2, +L2 The schematic is here: http://diytube.webpark.pl/cd6000b.JPG Robi |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cathode Bypass in a PP Output Stage | CLS | Tubes / Valves | 8 | 15th July 2008 05:32 AM |
| Bypass Hdam CD 6000 | aleksandar | Digital Source | 1 | 6th July 2007 10:12 AM |
| AD825 output stage:What bypass caps? | filholder | Digital Source | 3 | 16th April 2005 06:15 PM |
| cathode bypass in PP output stage? | RichJones | Tubes / Valves | 23 | 31st October 2003 09:30 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09115 seconds (77.16% PHP - 22.84% MySQL) with 10 queries |