|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Canada
|
When I look at various capacitor data sheets, they often have a insertion loss vs freq plot (in dB). If I want to find the best IC power supply decoupling cap, shall I look for the one with the minimum insertion loss?
If so, it is usually the smallest value (e.g. a few pF) has the lowest insertion loss at the highest freq, but this is not enough for poweer decoupling purpose, right? so ,I am at a loss with this "insertion loss" for the cap thing. Please help .... |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
insertion loss is not an issue for power decoupling capacitors,
sreten.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Canada
|
Really? I didn't know that.
I thought that there should be as little loss as possible for the power decoupling cap, so the noise will flow through the cap much "easier". I guess I am missing something here right? Please help. Thanks. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: As far from the NOSsers as possible
|
The purpose of a decoupling cap (on a power supply) is to provide a return path to ground at the lowest possible value, over as wide a range as possible.
Of course.....it depends on capacitance and frequency, so no one cap works in all situations. Someitmes, it is desirable for a cap to have a slightly higher than normal series resistance. Some regulaotors have peaking problems if the series resistance is zero ohms. Insetion loss is used to describe the characteristics of a L-C filter, in terms of the signal that is absorbed by the filter. Two different cases. Jocko |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
with 1% loss is far better for basic power supply decoupling duties. If high frequency loss is an issue add higher quality bypass capacitors. sreten.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Chicago area
|
Quote:
Not an issue for PS bypass use. If for some reason known only to you, you think this is a big deal choose a cap with lowest loss at the frequency where the electrolitics you are bypassing impedance starts to rise. Later BZ
__________________
What ever makes the tunes flow |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bipolar Caps for decoupling? | jtsaudio | Parts | 7 | 29th March 2009 11:35 AM |
| Caps for digital decoupling?? | imperfectcircle | Digital Source | 5 | 28th July 2006 05:39 PM |
| Decoupling caps(again) | argonrepublic | Parts | 2 | 10th May 2005 10:32 PM |
| decoupling caps | argonrepublic | Parts | 4 | 8th May 2005 10:20 PM |
| Best Decoupling caps for TDA1541 | mrstone | Digital Source | 0 | 27th January 2004 02:56 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09388 seconds (78.14% PHP - 21.86% MySQL) with 10 queries |