Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Source
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10th June 2004, 06:13 PM   #1
pop11 is offline pop11  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Canada
Unhappy Is insertion loss bad for decoupling caps?

When I look at various capacitor data sheets, they often have a insertion loss vs freq plot (in dB). If I want to find the best IC power supply decoupling cap, shall I look for the one with the minimum insertion loss?

If so, it is usually the smallest value (e.g. a few pF) has the lowest insertion loss at the highest freq, but this is not enough for poweer decoupling purpose, right?

so ,I am at a loss with this "insertion loss" for the cap thing. Please help ....
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th June 2004, 06:16 PM   #2
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
insertion loss is not an issue for power decoupling capacitors,

sreten.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th June 2004, 06:45 PM   #3
pop11 is offline pop11  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Canada
Really? I didn't know that.

I thought that there should be as little loss as possible for the power decoupling cap, so the noise will flow through the cap much "easier".

I guess I am missing something here right? Please help. Thanks.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th June 2004, 08:47 PM   #4
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: As far from the NOSsers as possible
The purpose of a decoupling cap (on a power supply) is to provide a return path to ground at the lowest possible value, over as wide a range as possible.

Of course.....it depends on capacitance and frequency, so no one cap works in all situations.

Someitmes, it is desirable for a cap to have a slightly higher than normal series resistance. Some regulaotors have peaking problems if the series resistance is zero ohms.

Insetion loss is used to describe the characteristics of a L-C filter, in terms of the signal that is absorbed by the filter.

Two different cases.

Jocko
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th June 2004, 09:02 PM   #5
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Quote:
Originally posted by pop11
Really? I didn't know that.

I thought that there should be as little loss as possible for the power decoupling cap, so the noise will flow through the cap much "easier".

I guess I am missing something here right? Please help. Thanks.
A cheap capacitor with 10% insertion loss but 100 x the value of a capacitor
with 1% loss is far better for basic power supply decoupling duties.

If high frequency loss is an issue add higher quality bypass capacitors.

sreten.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th June 2004, 09:43 PM   #6
HDTVman is offline HDTVman  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Chicago area
Default Re: Is insertion loss bad for decoupling caps?

Quote:
Originally posted by pop11
When I look at various capacitor data sheets, they often have a insertion loss vs freq plot (in dB). If I want to find the best IC power supply decoupling cap, shall I look for the one with the minimum insertion loss?

If so, it is usually the smallest value (e.g. a few pF) has the lowest insertion loss at the highest freq, but this is not enough for poweer decoupling purpose, right?

so ,I am at a loss with this "insertion loss" for the cap thing. Please help ....
Insertion loss refers to the amount the signal is attenuated in a RF circuit when the cap is used as a series pass element. This is generally stated in "dB insertion loss @ X mHz". Most of the time this will be spec-ed at 50 or 75 ohms.

Not an issue for PS bypass use.

If for some reason known only to you, you think this is a big deal choose a cap with lowest loss at the frequency where the electrolitics you are bypassing impedance starts to rise.

Later BZ
__________________
What ever makes the tunes flow
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bipolar Caps for decoupling? jtsaudio Parts 7 29th March 2009 11:35 AM
Caps for digital decoupling?? imperfectcircle Digital Source 5 28th July 2006 05:39 PM
Decoupling caps(again) argonrepublic Parts 2 10th May 2005 10:32 PM
decoupling caps argonrepublic Parts 4 8th May 2005 10:20 PM
Best Decoupling caps for TDA1541 mrstone Digital Source 0 27th January 2004 02:56 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:56 PM.

Page generated in 0.09388 seconds (78.14% PHP - 21.86% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio