|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I have found mixed opinions on the net regarding the possible negative influence (eg. kaboom) that the HF garbage (images) that non-os dacs produce might have on extended response tweeters that do not have a protective self-inductance.
I have a pair of Infinity RSII's (EMIT planar-magnetic tweeter - flat to 32kHz) which came from the factory with 1.5A fuses on the tweeters (paralelled, 2 ohms impedance). edit: amplifier bandwith is DC-150kHz, -3dB Should I worry about this? some spectrum data: http://www.diyparadiso.com/teksten/i.../solnodac1.htm (not I'm going after but the non-os output should be similar) Thanks!
__________________
Deep down inside. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison Wisconsin
|
Magnepan 3.5R here, tweeter fuses removed, non-OS DAC, happy camper.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
So I guess everything would be ok. I'm looking for more opinions though...
__________________
Deep down inside. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Belgium
|
This is generally unproblematic, for two reasons.
First, the zero-order-hold nature of most NONOS DACs (exception: the TNT Convertus Decima, which was just an experiment) implies a treble rolloff following Sin(f)/f, which attenuates the HF output strongly above 35kHz, and even nulls it completely at 44.1kHz. Secondly, the spectrum occupied by most music falls off drastically above 4kHz or so. These two things combined mean that in the band 20-35kHz there is not a lot of energy (due to the nature of music), and in the band 35-50kHz there is not a lot again, due to the Sin(f)/f droop. Remember that it is power that destructs tweeters, and even with a signal voltage attenuation of 10 dB (not that much), power is down to 10% of the original level. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Thanks werner!
PS. I just put the tweeter fuses back in (sounds a bit
__________________
Deep down inside. |
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grenoble, FR
|
Quote:
The sinc(f) rolloff exists in a non-os dac, agreed. But this is for the music reproduction. In other words, information stored in your cd, will have a slight treble rolloff when player through such a dac. And, even more obvious: there's absolutely no music content on a CD, above 22kHz (Fs/s) so 35kHz and 44kHz sounds aren't attenuated, there aren't any! It's impossible to have them. The 44.1kHz signal you have on the output of non-os dacs is due to the fact that your signal is sampled at 44.1kHz, so the dac sets a value on its output, maintain it for 1/44100 second, outputs a new value and keep it also for the same period, etc... If you look closely at this output signal, it will be made of small steps And those steps cause the 44.1kHz "garbage" on the output. Decompose the signal in fourrier series, you'll see that the regularly spaced steps (at every 1/44100th of a second) will show an important signal at this frequency. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: .
|
Bricolo, you seem to be forgetting something. Without any filtering the entire 0Hz to 22k05Hz spectrum repeats every 44k1Hz.
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grenoble, FR
|
could you explain?
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Belgium
|
Quote:
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| what is 1x oversampling | amp builder jb | Digital Source | 4 | 25th July 2005 02:38 PM |
| DAC- which way- oversampling or non-oversampling | Rave | Digital Source | 24 | 20th March 2005 02:19 PM |
| TDA5141 oversampling or non-oversampling ? | Bernhard | Digital Source | 4 | 1st September 2004 10:27 AM |
| Non Oversampling Vs Oversampling | jkeny | Digital Source | 25 | 9th April 2002 07:50 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12059 seconds (87.45% PHP - 12.55% MySQL) with 10 queries |