Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Source
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 8th June 2004, 07:26 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Canada
Question TDA1543 DAC issues and observations.

Overall very happy with the results.

The NonozIII schematics is great, I experimented with quite a few things to test the changes and in most of the returned to the original specs.

The voltage regulators were LM78xx and i replaced them with Panasonic AN8008/AN8005M series. I noticed a big improvement in battery life using those regulators. The sound became better, more refined using AN80xx regulators. The DAC is now powered from the battery supply(12AAA 700mAh cells) since the regulators are getting very hot when running from 24V regulated power supply. This is a supply used for my PPA and both PPA and DAC will eventually be powered from it or the battery. The DAC will be using 2 or 4 2N5486 jfets to clean some ripple and provide rail isolation from the PPA ground.

Question:
What would be the best solution to adapt the DAC for 12-24V supplies and avoid AN80xx heat issue? They don't have the heatsink like the LM78xx ones and may be destroyed over time, I think. I was thinking about aditional regulator to bring the output voltage to 12V first but that would affect battery runtime. Transformers are not practical, since I targeted for a portable solution.

For the passive I/V stage I tried using a trebble correction circiut

but didn't like it compared with non-polar BG passive circiut by Fedde. The 3k resistors sound a bit too loud, i replaced them with Riken 1.8k. Riken does make a big difference, more pleasant sound, especially voices are rendered better, bigger soundstage.

One more question:
For phase inverting problem, I'm looking into transformers now. Does anyone have experience which type i can use here? Jensen make some pretty good ones, but they are not easy to find. Also, how much would it affect the sound if I put a lineout transformer on each channel to invert the phase?

And the last question:
Does using SN75179B really imrove the CS8414 jitter handling and the sound? I haven't tried this driver/receiver chip yet, but very tempted to order it from Newark after reading Peter Daniel posts. Peter uses SN75179B in combination with CS8412 chip which is not exactly the same as CS8414, the latter has better error handler as far as I know.
Attached Images
File Type: png iv_fedde.png (1.4 KB, 474 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2004, 08:09 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Peter Daniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Send a message via AIM to Peter Daniel
I didn't really compare the circuit with and without SN75179B, so I can't comment on actual improvement. However, comparing to my previous DACs without that buffer, the one using it sounds as good or better.

As to the voltage level before AN800x regulators, I'm dropping some of it with passive CLCRCRC filtering. So I'm ending up eith 12V before AN8008 reg and 8V before AN8005. They stay pretty cool this way. You might attach small heatsink to TO-92 case or in case of lack of such glue a piece of aluminum (to the case) using 2 part epoxy.

The resistors are on order of 10ohms and caps are approx 3300u.
__________________
www.audiosector.com
“Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th June 2004, 10:00 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Audiofanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Netherlands, Utrecht
Default Off topic?

Hi guys,

Can one of you tell me where to buy the AN8005 reg in europe?

Thanks in advance,


Audiofanatic
__________________
Be nice to animals.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th June 2004, 07:52 AM   #4
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Zamboanga, City of Flowers, Mindanao
Send a message via Yahoo to Elso Kwak
Thumbs down AN8005

Hi ,
I tried the AN8005 in place of my triple Darlington regulator circuit with a LM329 and a constant current source.
I was not impressed by the AN8005. There was a lack of inner voices and bass slam.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th June 2004, 08:53 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Audiofanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Netherlands, Utrecht
Default Re: AN8005

Quote:
Originally posted by Elso Kwak
Hi ,
I tried the AN8005 in place of my triple Darlington regulator circuit with a LM329 and a constant current source.
I was not impressed by the AN8005. There was a lack of inner voices and bass slam.

Hi Elso,

Thanks for the warning
I wasn't gona use it in my DAC PSU.
It is for my CD80 PSU and for testing, to see (listen) if the sound of the CD80 can get better with this AN80xx

Thanks anyway.


Audiofanatic
__________________
Be nice to animals.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th June 2004, 02:31 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Peter Daniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Send a message via AIM to Peter Daniel
Default Re: AN8005

Quote:
Originally posted by Elso Kwak
Hi ,
I tried the AN8005 in place of my triple Darlington regulator circuit with a LM329 and a constant current source.
I was not impressed by the AN8005. There was a lack of inner voices and bass slam.
What bypass caps (values) did you use?
__________________
www.audiosector.com
“Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th June 2004, 03:11 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Hi IpsilonSound
Are you enjoying the sound of the dac?
I like mine ,especially since implementing Peters[cheers] recommendations
regarding caps and Rikens.
It is sensitive to recordings though, whether the top end sounds
'all there' seems on a bit of a knife edge at times...

I have also noticed when doing a 20-22k frequency sweep , [nothing sophisticated, just a test CD] that as the higher frequencies pass by there are some 'birdies' to be heard
phasing in an out as the frequency changes .
Spot frequency checks reveal all kinds of differences
compared to My Arcam CD23..

Are these intermodulation products ?

Though I can still enjoy the sound of this unit, as long as I don't
think about it too hard.

Here,s a pic of my little dac in bed with its partnering amp for the
portable headphone setup.


Cheers


Setmenu
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 115-1560_img77k.jpg (77.4 KB, 437 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th June 2004, 03:17 PM   #8
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Zamboanga, City of Flowers, Mindanao
Send a message via Yahoo to Elso Kwak
Lightbulb Re: Re: AN8005

Quote:
Originally posted by Peter Daniel


What bypass caps (values) did you use?
Hi Peter, The same as with my triple Darlington regulator, to make things comparable.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th June 2004, 03:24 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Canada
Default Powering DAC and PPA from the same supply/battery board.

Using 2N5486 to isolate the power from the DAC ground doesn't work. I burned a few 2N5486 transistors last night trying to connect V- V+ from the PPA to the DAC power thru them. My PPA power rail cascodes could've been destroyed this way, but survived I noticed that AOS Electronics using the same approach on his Ally DAC which works in combination with PPA. No idea why mine doesn't work when it should (

Maybe the only way to isolate the DAC ground from the PPA is using the 1:1 transformer?

Anyone can suggest isolation 1:1 transformers in the region of 15-30V suitable for this task? I would need to use a small one to reduce the weight of DAC and save batteries as much as possible.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th June 2004, 03:31 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
When i tried running my dac and amp off the same battery pack
I did not connect the dac ground to the amp pot ground.
merely connected the L+R dac outputs.
I preferred the sound of separate supplies though.

Any comments on the birdies?
Elso?



Setmenu
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Observations of FE127 VS. FE126 VS. FE103 and different enclosures Harderror Full Range 11 24th February 2012 02:00 PM
Observations of amplifier sound bigwill Tubes / Valves 5 30th December 2008 12:18 PM
Transistor HFE observations. Zero Cool Solid State 35 26th December 2006 10:10 AM
Fostex 103e Observations kaybee Full Range 10 10th November 2006 11:36 AM
TT cartridge observations bart_dood Analogue Source 6 10th December 2003 02:06 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:56 PM.

Page generated in 0.12698 seconds (81.08% PHP - 18.92% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio