|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Searchin' for Sweet Singletrack
|
I have a CD723 with all the "Chris Found" mods plus:
KC-7, AD826 I/V Schottky PSU diodes Separate transformer with emitter follower type power supplies for the OpAmp and DAC (cut down version of the Audionote PSU). Servo 11V is still supplied off the original unregulated supply. Output caps 22uF 63V FCs bypassed with 10nF Wima polypropylenes Chassis damping In varying amounts, most of the mods made improvements to the sound of the player. However it is still some way behind my lightly modified Arcam Alpha+ player (Trichord clock and a few component upgrades) and a long way behind my friend's Cambridge Audio CD2, both of which are 10+ years old. I reckon the CD723 is comparable with a decent modern £400 CD player. Any suggestions to make the CD723 better, or have I reached the limit with this very cheap machine??? |
|
|
|
#2 | ||||||||
|
Previously: Kuei Yang Wang
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Somewhere nice on planet earth where censorship of Ideas is frowned upon
|
Konnichiwa,
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Sayonara |
||||||||
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Banned
|
Quote:
You could try the OPA2604 or the OP275 for IV. Jung like regulators seem to better suited for the analog stages in my experience. A balanced power 1:1 transformer improved the sound of my Philips CD931. Ultrasoft recovery diodes worked better for me, but this is clearly player dependent as all mods. In the Philips CD650 I heard a big difference, in the CD931 not.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
"you have to be cruel to be kind"
Mods improve matters but there's no way you can expect to be able to bypass total high quality build practises. You can't turn a cheap CD player into a giant killer. sreten.
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Germany
|
Say that again to the Tjoeb guys !
__________________
It's only audio |
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Previously: Kuei Yang Wang
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Somewhere nice on planet earth where censorship of Ideas is frowned upon
|
Konnichiwa,
Quote:
1) Powersupply - complete joke. Fit seperate transformers/supplies for Analogue Stage & DAC (+/-12V & 5V), one for the Servo circuitry (+/-12V), one for the clock (5V) - use the basic Tent Audio Module - hard to implement it wrong if you use a fully insulated supply, fit correctly & forget and one (5V - might be 3.3V on the later verions) Supply for the main CD processor. Build well implemented and de-noised supplies and clean up the original supply to only supply "utility" digital circuitry (uP/Display/Remote etc.). All the transformers used to supply especially the digital section should be chosen for minimal leakage between secondary and earth and suitably phased/ploarised to minimise further any leakage. Then add an external 1:1 insulation transformer and filter, non of this needs a lot of power. 2) Chassis - complete joke. For a minimum fit a serious solid wood bottom plate (spruce plywood) and fit some decoupling feet like the String Suspension thingies you get. Add solid hardwood sidecheeks and a plywood rear panel, plus a nice solid vented top cover made from thin spruce ply, for fun make the vent openings in the shape of Violin Vents. C37 laquering of wood and PCB's are optional. 3) Fit a nice superfast Op-Amp (LM6182 is still my choice) in the analog stage (more or less original circuit adjusted for 2mA Full Scale Current), no capacitor in the feedback loop and follow by a simple low impedance 1st Order LPF (I used 100R/15..22nF IIRC) and a suitable (passive) offset adjustment to get rid of the output offset. Now the above can be done well on a fairly tight budget, within the existing case so on. For more extreme versions a string suspended drive for a toploader might be worth a try. The Digital Filter and DAC in the CD-723 are "good enough for CD", if you make sure to eliminate the other problems. Sayonara |
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
|
Quote:
Quote:
CD4SE is miles better than any modded cheap CD player, tubes added or not, and as far as I'm concerned thats it. sreten.
|
||
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Germany
|
Quote:
For bog standard more or less expensive cdplayers without needed work you're on the wrong forum Besides that there are plenty expensive cdplayers with excellent build quality that sound absolutely mediocre. The fun with DIY can be making a very good cdplayer with a cheap basic model and some hard earned knowledge.I don't want to challenge you but your remark "miles better than any modded cheap CD player" is like walking on thin ice.
__________________
It's only audio |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somerset, SW England
|
I had a CD4SE and they are excellent CDP's but I don't know if it is that much better than my modified CD723 (which cost me about half of what the CD4SE did!
__________________
The truth need not be veiled, for it veils itself from the eyes of the ignorant. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| TL Subs sounding mediocre | bigwill | Subwoofers | 13 | 27th December 2005 08:08 PM |
| Emphasising the transients, but making the mediocre listenable | rick57 | Tubes / Valves | 11 | 23rd September 2005 03:02 AM |
| A new clock mod for cd723 | apolon34 | Digital Source | 2 | 27th November 2004 11:17 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |