|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
  |
|
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
18th May 2004, 01:40 PM
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southern NJ
|
Audio v. non-audio ADC chip difference?
I was browsing around the TI site since I'm toying with getting into digital DIY in the upcoming months. I was surprised to see they separate non-audio and audio ADC, even quote specs differently (samples/sec vs freq.).
Thoughts on why? (FYI - I will eventually build an audio ADC/DAC of course, but I'm also interested in a data sampler for other, non-audio projects.) |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Any audio difference between FE166 and FE167 | ttan98 | Full Range | 7 | 7th January 2009 03:05 PM |
| STA575 audio amp chip | grummaniser | Parts | 2 | 27th September 2008 11:18 AM |
| I'm anti-expensive audio parts but man, a good capacitor can make a difference | jduffy | Tubes / Valves | 6 | 25th April 2007 04:13 AM |
| Car audio chip amp | maylar | Chip Amps | 0 | 1st February 2005 07:18 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07150 seconds (70.42% PHP - 29.58% MySQL) with 10 queries |
