DIYing the Digital Oscilloscope
I've been thinking about this for a long time coming and its finally dawned on me that I might be able to actually start this.
The plan sofare is to create a handheld DSO capable of doing pretty much anything and more of its analog equivalent (cheating of coarse).
I'm not too interested in all the extras i can incorperate through software at the moment since it would be useless without some base hardware to develop for.
Sofare the specs stand at -
DS89C450 - 4 8 bit IO's, 64kb of program memory, 33 MIPS @ 33 Mhz
SN74V3690 - synchronus FIFO, 32768 x 36bits, 133Mhz max, 5v tolerant
2x ADS5500 (or slower equivalent) - 14 bit ADC, 125MSPS
Graphic lcd of some undecided size
The uC I chose should, by all means, be fast enough to display everything. The FIFO acts as a storage buffer with the ADC's constantly running whether the FIFO is full or not. Once a refresh needs to take place, the FIFO can be reset for fresh data and read by the uC. To have enough room for all the IO's, the FIFO can be read on an 8 bit bus whilst still being able to take data at 36 bits.
The true potensial of such a accurate scope wouldn't be used whilst its outputting to the graphics lcd. If you think about it, even if its 320x240 pixels wide, thats only 320 samples it can fit across the screen at most. The true potensial would be used via USB (or maybe something else??) to connect to a computer to provide, very simply, anything we can possibly do with the ADC data.
The only software issue I'm going to mention is trigering. Do most scopes just trigger at a regular interval or do they try to match the waveform previously sampled?
Optional features such as a logic analyser might be able to be included but IO space is at a premium. If an IO expander is used speed is greatly reduced in most cases which would limit the use of the feature to lower speed logic.
Thing such as input buffers, I don't have alot of information about.
the bitScope site has schematics of thier input buffer, but its only capable of +- 5v. Does anyone know of a better way to get a larger input voltage and/or a way to control the range digitally?
A range of +- 60v would give you 600v with a 10x probe which would be ideal.
heh thats alot of typing...
If anyone has any comment or surgestion please jump in.
I don't mind if you poke holes through my dream whatsoever :D
I'm building a scope at the moment, not handheld though but PC based.
The problem with the FIFO method is that you can't have any pretrig (that is save data before the trig point). Instead I use a regular synchronous SRAM as a circular buffer. I save data all the time while waiting for a trig and then I stop a preset number of samples after the trig point. This memory is hooked up to a FPGA that also handles trigger logic, downsampling and other things.
I think the most difficult part of a proper scope design is the analog input stage. Most likely you want:
High input impedance so you can use ordinary probes.
Variable attenuation and amplification so you can change "volts/div".
Variable DC offset.
Low temperature drift.
I'm been working on mine for quite a while, and I think I'm getting close. I haven't updated my website with the latest developments in a while, but I will soon (next week probably). It may be of some use to you:
In addition to high input impedance, 50 ohms is nice!
If you want to skip the input massaging perhaps using a surplus Tek or other vertical amp would be possible...
Is it correct to say most scopes only display the information collected after a trigger point? (I'm definately not 100% on scope operation :cannotbe: )
The site you linked off your own site (which i assume your design is based upon) has a very nice input buffer which it seems has taken everything into account. http://www.johann-glaser.at/projects/DSO/analog/
In that design, is the purpose of the DAC to set the 0v reference? (1v in a 2v peak to peak ADC)
In that case can just a standard reference be used?
Maxim now do temperature adjusted reference chips which may simplify things.
thanks for you input sofar
Its very much appreciated
Yes, yes there is definitly a point in being able to record events prior tp the trigger point.
In fact having a flexible triggering system is one of the most important things on any digital data aquisition system/scope, it makes is much more usefull.
Try looking in the manual of a digital scope or data aquistion card(DAQ).
I use a DAQ from National Instruments,NI- 6052E, which has a very nice and flexible system for triggers, you can find the on the NI webiste.
I did some quick research and I now see your point about the FIFO and pre triggers.
For this application, trigger settings have to be done in the digital domain. The only thing is the DS89C450 doesn't have the required speed to search for triggers whilst still retaining a buffer of already examined figures before the trigger point. I can however see a few ways of maybe getting around this.
For measuring repetitive waveforms there has to be an initial trigger event. From this we can calulate frequency, ampliftude, rise/fall times etc. from the collected data as a basis for the next trigger event. In this case, is it safe to assume we can predict the next trigger point and approximate a point before it to start capturing? Then a more exact trigger point can be found by going through the recorded data before the approximate. We can then vary the times prior to the approximated trigger according to the user's input, or by a ratio according to frequency.
For transients, I can only think of the standard logic/threshhold type triggers in order to capture the event accurately but, as you've said, the FIFO won't retain data after it has been written to the uC for display which won't allow pretrigger data to be captured.
i'll get some sleep and thing more about this
The biggest flaw with that analog design IMHO, is that it's too complicated. Too many opamps... Also I think having no 1:1 setting on the input attenuator is a waste.
My current design has a JFET opamp (OPA655) on the input, two gain stages (5x and 2x) and drives the ADC single ended. Only three opamps in the signal path.
The DAC is used to set the DC offset, there are two reasons for having it adjustable.
1) Compensate for the offset in the gain stages.
2) DC-shift the input signal to make better use of the ADC resolution when the input isn't centered around 0v.
My design also controls the ADC reference voltage with a DAC, to compensate for gain errors and also provide a little extra "virtual" gain.
Most of the TI ADC have 2v p2p differential inputs. In the datasheet they show the use of a THS4502 for the differential driving of the ADC from a single ended signal at a gain of 1. If I use that along with a FET input opamp also at a gain of 1, I would have an input stage capable of a max +- 100v? With a 10x probe that allows for +-1Kv to be measured with a resolution of ~0.1v still (using all 14 bits).
From there I could do software scaling in order to fit the waveform to the screen.
I assume thats what you've done for your original DSO.
Do you have the schematic of your final analog stage?
with respect to offset, there are precision op-amps with auto-offset features (from TI)
if the device is going to have any meaningful bandwidth you might want to consider using op-amps with "disable" function rather than inserting switches in the signal path. TI will send you samples.
When you begin talking of inputs in the 1kV range you are entering into a different strata of measurement and control. Note that some resistors become non-linear over a few hundred volts, note also that with just a little current you can fry a resistor that isn't rated for HV.
|All times are GMT. The time now is 09:32 AM.|
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2015 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2015 diyAudio