|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norway
|
I was looking to bye me a "new" CDP, and had decided to go for a player with a CDM9 laser, becauce of it probably is newer, and not so tired.
Then thinking that a Marantz would be my best bet in the choice between Philips and Marantz, at least I like the look better with the Marantz players.... But I can't find any Marantz using CDM9 !? Seems to me like they jumped from CDM4 directly to CDM12 lasers, is this true ? If I could get hold of a new laser to the CDM4, wouldn't this be a better choice anyway, for instance a CD62 (think it was named this), or preferably a Marantz CD72 MKII ??? The CD72 MKII is the most expensive/best Marantz using CDM4, isn't it ? Need some guidance.... pleeeease Lyra |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grenoble, FR
|
The CD72 II SE is the best choice IMO
I don't think that Marantz made players with the CDM-9 The CD62 is a good choice too, I have one. If you want to change the dac and output stage it's a good choice, since it has a separate board for this, you just have to change it and build your own |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Austria
|
Hi!
äh, only for my interest, where would you place the Marantz CD50SE, if you know that player? Thank you!
__________________
regards / servus |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grenoble, FR
|
I don't know it's sound quality, but it looks like the CD62's father
![]() The same chassis, same 2 board conception, but with a TDA1541. It could even be a better starting base for a diyer |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Austria
|
yeah, actually itīs the best iīve ever heared through my Headphonesīs
Wow, itīs the best buy iīve ever made, costs: 19,5 I donīt want to solder it to dead, this one I will never get anymore for this money ;-) Plans: replace 5532 with AD826 or OP2604.... make the GND plane more solid... Kwak Clock, if Iīll ever make a smd-pcb for it... Today I bought the vifa ringradiators, they are also
__________________
regards / servus |
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grenoble, FR
|
Quote:
yes, change the opamps. maybe a discrete i/v and new caps later... you can add a clock, try the non-os mod |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Austria
|
Hi Bricolo!
I have already tried NON-OS with a standalone TDA1541A feed by an Envy24 PC.... I really prefer the marantz.... I would not go the non-os way if you look at the frequency diagramm of the vifa XT25... otherwise Iīll need a steep post-filter (but anyway, itīs worth a try) Is it the transport? I have a older sony player with "TDA1541a==>I/V via AD8620==>my ClassA HP amp" where I changed the lytic caps almost all to Panasonic FC.... No chance for the Sony.... It must be the transport OR ME ;-) Today I listened to a Accuphase CD75... hah, thatīs not my beer, even If I could get it also so cheap.... btw, it uses the "standard" setup: SAA7220B-TDA1541A-NE5532
__________________
regards / servus |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norway
|
Just wondering....???
What is the originally DAC in the CD72 MKII ? ..and the CD62 ? Any Marantz with the pcm63 DAC ?????? ...don't think so, but I'll have to ask to bee 100% sure..... |
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grenoble, FR
|
Quote:
saa7350 |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Wroclaw
|
Lyra,
I don't know any Marantz with CDM 9 ,but I had a players with this transport and the laser lens dies really quick! I think CDM4 and CDM 1/MKII lasers last much lomger,and I also heard that te first CDM 1 is almost indestructible ,lasting many,many years. The players with CDM 9 I know are: Philips 930/931 and Philips 950/951 but these two are not that good for modding ,having many errors and ground loops on PCB. The other players are Arcam 70.2 and Arcam Alpha 5 and Arcam Alpha 5+. Also Naim CD 3 and CD 2 I laso thought about using the player with cdm 9 for modding,becouse I had a chance to buy new CDM 9 spare lenses very cheap,but after taking look at build quality of CDM 1 I prefer CDM 1.I think it's build quality is much better. For now I'm using CDM 1/MKII,having no problem with spare lasers as CDM 4/19 laser is a direct replacement and works great (this is actually the same laser/arm). I have heard that CDM1 is even better,so I'm going to try it as soon as I find a good cd player that is equipped with it. I also think there won't be a lot of problems with spare laser in case of CDM 1.There are many old ,cheap Philips players that I can buy just to get the working laser,and it last very long. Bartek |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Datasheet for CDM9 / CDM9 Pro | Lgrau | Parts | 1 | 19th February 2012 08:22 PM |
| Difference between CDM9/50 & CDM9/60 | kik73 | Digital Source | 1 | 12th April 2010 01:21 PM |
| Is the CDM9/63 compatible with CDM9/44 | philpoole | Digital Source | 0 | 14th November 2006 03:02 PM |
| Buy Cdm9 pro | Thomasliu | Digital Source | 0 | 25th February 2005 11:43 PM |
| CDM9 pro.....where are they....? | tbla | Digital Source | 23 | 11th October 2004 06:46 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11421 seconds (82.94% PHP - 17.06% MySQL) with 10 queries |