|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cracow
|
Hello,
Well it's been months since my two AD21065L have arrived, so I decided to make use of them, at the long last. Anyone tried to use it as a digital filter in a DAC? What kinds of filtering would I actually need? I ask because I wonder about the complexity of programming requred to get this Sharc do what I want. I assume, I would need: IIR filtering, some kind of resampling (upsampling to 88.2 4 example), maybe dithering, maybe some form of group delay-correction? What would you say? I already have some AD1896, but I do not want to use them unless I have to (in context of Sharc they would be usefull just because I would have the same bitrate, bitdepth signal delivered to my AD-21065L). Could anyone provide me with some information (links) on various upsampling/interpolation/dithering/group-delay correction alghoritms? What do you this about all this? Thanks, esl |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Russia
|
I think it's very difficulty. I work with ADSP SHARK family for a long time and I often encounter with noise troubles. This DSP has wide noise spread which raise up to 10 GHz. The components of this noise flows throught digital ground plane and destabilizes functioning of other devices which connected to digital ground plane. One of the way to solve this problem is separating of the digital ground plane to several parts such as DGND, DSPGND, and shielding of the DSP. Also, DSP ports have significant aperture uncertainty which increase output signal jitter.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cracow
|
Hi,
apart from the noise problems do you think that this dsp would be usable for such application? As for mentioned aperture uncertainty... this could be a problem, because - in theory - I could use ASRC *after* DSP, but I feel that it would end-up with too much signal manipulation. Is there any other solution to get rid of jitter without using ASRC.. .. any FIFO, whatever? Cheers, esl |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FIR Digital Filter DSP | neededandwanted | Parts | 1 | 9th April 2009 01:44 AM |
| FIR Digital Filter | PatPet | Digital Source | 39 | 8th March 2006 07:40 PM |
| Digital (DSP) filter | magnus | Digital Source | 12 | 9th February 2003 12:17 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08048 seconds (71.98% PHP - 28.02% MySQL) with 10 queries |