"Best" local oscillator regulator? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Source

Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th July 2012, 11:57 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Default "Best" local oscillator regulator?

I have not seen this specifically discussed before, so I was looking for some expert opinions and recommendations. It has come to my attention, that perhaps, high feedback regulators may not be the best choice as the final regulation stage for an oscillator module. Right now I am using Twisted Pear Audio Tridents to power the two oscillators (CCHD-957s) on my async USB interface.
Any ideas on powering clocks, and any available oscillators or simple oscillator circuits to try (non feedback perhaps...)
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2012, 12:50 AM   #2
DUG is offline DUG  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: mississauga ontario canada
Well, the oscillators wants 3.3V +- 0.3V so they appear not to be too fussy about their supply.

The Trident looks like 3.3V +- 1% 100mA max with max input of 5.5V

Depending on accuracy and package, I did a search of Digikey and found 387 instock that might be accurate enough for the job. (I would have narrowed it down further but the accuracy column seems to have disappeared and I don't know what package you would like to use.)

I've used MIC5201-3.3YS TR and it seems to work fine. It is an SOT-223 package and I like the pin-out because it is similar to the LM78xx TO-220 types in that the tab is GND and I ground it to the ground plane as a heat sink.
__________________
Doug We are all learning...we can all help
"You can't stop the signal, Mal. Everything goes somewhere..."
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2012, 02:24 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Default potential problems...

Oscillator modules are very, very sensitive to any supply noise, and jitter levels are highly dependent on having a super clean DC supply. Additionally, regulator output impedance may be very important to keep the clock frequency from traveling back through the supply and contaminating the other supplies in the DAC.

So noise, and output impedance are two critical factors, whereas voltage stability may not be such a critical factor.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2012, 03:48 AM   #4
qusp is offline qusp  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
qusp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
use a battery, simple. they want low noise, they are about as benign (not dynamic at all, not high current at all) a load as you'll get. stability is important, just not very hard to achieve
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2012, 03:53 AM   #5
qusp is offline qusp  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
qusp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
alternatively Demian (1audio) has presented some very nice discrete clock regs, including ground isolated output. you can search, or just pm me your email addy that would be easier for me than searching for you
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2012, 09:32 AM   #6
marce is offline marce  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Blackburn, Lancs
LDO regulator circuit for your clock, used extensively these days on high rel designs, plenty to choose from from Linear or Texas. Layout and if possible simulation of layout will get the best results with clocks, and minimum distance for clock signal to travel.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2012, 09:44 AM   #7
qusp is offline qusp  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
qusp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
the dac clock used to have an LT LDO as standard in this design but they changed to shunts. hes trying to move away from massive feedback and I presume something better than an LDO. non feedback clock circuits are going to be pretty shithouse IMO, not even sure how you would do it in any meaningful way. I guess this is Loriens board yes barrows?
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2012, 02:55 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Default clocks/regs

Thanks Qusp. I have used batteries (LiFePO) before, and did not like the charging hassle, but for just oscillators it might be worth another try. Are you having good results with LiFePOs nominal 3.2 volts direct to an 3.3V oscillator with no further circuitry? I guess the LiFePO output voltage is stable enough for this application.
Has anyone actually measured the LiFePO battery for noise? I know there is noise caused by the internal chemical reactions, but have never seen a measured spec?
I am using an SOtM async USB receiver board so the layout is what it is-I am just adding separate power supply for the clocks with a dedicated regulator for each of them, and am definiterly looking for something better than IC regs. I hoped to draw out the experts who might be able to discuss the feedback question for clock regulators.
I will also search for Demian's designs, as I would like to read the context of the threads they came up in as well.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2012, 03:13 PM   #9
marce is offline marce  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Blackburn, Lancs
Anyone listened to Li-ion batteries?
some figures on this thread regarding battery noise.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2012, 03:30 PM   #10
qusp is offline qusp  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
qusp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
just quickly, i'll reply to the rest later, but Demian presents his regs earlyish in the fifo thread and there is also some talk of it in the widget thread, as they are included on the PCB as an option. I still havent seen proper testing of lifepo4 noise either, but under such low current draw I really doubt its even worth worrying about, plus the benefits of being totally floating.

i'm just not sure how you would make a non feedback clock at a specific audio related frequency, the output stage of the clocks buffers but also sets the speed by multiplication/division. without feedback you would be stuck with the fundamental frequency of the crystal and they simply dont oscillate at audio frequencies.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: 12" and 15" dipole cabinets ($40 each, local pickup in Silicon Valley) davidespinosa Swap Meet 3 28th January 2012 06:56 AM
FS: 12" and 15" dipole cabinets, local pickup in Silicon Valley davidespinosa Swap Meet 4 28th January 2012 06:53 AM
Linear voltage regulator: how to make good use of "sense" and "ground sense"? NeoY2k Analog Line Level 7 7th September 2008 12:35 AM
Zener regulator with "integrated" pre-regulator 00940 Power Supplies 17 22nd July 2008 06:11 PM
Effect of cross-coupled "local" FB on plate load of previous stage ray_moth Tubes / Valves 23 27th April 2005 09:55 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:43 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2