|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hof,Norway with Nice Mountains!
|
Is there any 100% compatible transceivers to thisone?
It is inside a DAC and i want to upgrade it. Any good suggest ManUtd. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
|
cs8414 is totally compatible if you have a soic -> dip adapter.
-- Brian |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Germany
|
What is your intention?
Upgrading sound quality? Then a change of the receiver chip alone won't help. Changing the frontend to a ASRC fed from a local low-jitter clock can improve things as well as reclocking near the DAC chips. If all you need is 96/24 compatibility, the CS8414 will work as a pin-compatible replacement, and, depending on the application (schematic?), if you're lucky you won't have to modify anything else. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
8412 and 8414 isn't 100% compatible, the LED's are changed (maybe something else) but otherwise it's similar.
If you mainly have 44.1/16 signals this change to 8414 won't be a big upgrade.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hof,Norway with Nice Mountains!
|
Quote:
My intension is only to replace a CS8412 inside a DAC,but i can not find a 8412 at Crystal Inc only 8414. ManUtd. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hof,Norway with Nice Mountains!
|
Quote:
I have CS8412 inside a DAC from AudioSynthesis called DSM. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Electrons are yellow and more is better!
diyAudio Member
|
They main difference between the recievers is that the 8414 can take 96 kSp so if you don't have any 96 kSp material this won't be a great upgrade.
__________________
/Per-Anders (my first name) or P-A as my friends call me |
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hof,Norway with Nice Mountains!
|
Quote:
Only reason for this change is i can`t find any CS8412. ManUtd |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Indonesia, Jakarta
|
What do you mean manutd, upgrade with the same chip doesn't result anything, if you wanna make difference try give that chip a better power supply and wanna make a little extereme, power your DAC with battery, make a big leap change.
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| why cs8412? | SunRa | Digital Source | 2 | 24th November 2006 06:36 AM |
| Anyone have CS8412? | bezobraznia | Digital Source | 16 | 15th December 2005 09:08 AM |
| Cs8412 | burbeck | Parts | 1 | 25th February 2005 10:06 AM |
| Fs: Cs8412 | mdlover | Swap Meet | 0 | 26th January 2005 04:10 PM |
| Help with Cs8412 | NickC | Digital Source | 0 | 6th January 2004 11:11 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10390 seconds (79.75% PHP - 20.25% MySQL) with 10 queries |