Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Source
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12th December 2011, 07:42 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Default Shigaclone vs. Computer Audio Transports

I know the big "trend" has been pushing computer audio. From lower budget ($500 range) USB based transports to higher ($800++++) USB transports. I also know many have tossed the traditional high end equipment in favor of the computer path, stating it's the best sound they have heard.

To get to the point, how is the Shigaclone or another similar "traditional" based transport by comparison to a cost no option computer based solution? Has anyone been able to do the comparisons and come up with the conclusions?

I understand this may be something that could come down to how much one puts into parts cost when making the Shigaclone OR maybe it does not?

For reference, I have used the Squeezebox Touch (nice-decent) and a stock Hiface (also "ok"). But frankly, the Touch maybe inches out ahead of the Hiface, while the Hiface and some random cheap old DVD player sound pretty much the same!

My goal is to put price into an obvious perspective, while also assessing "convenience" (I.E. controlling whatever from the computer is far easier than getting up to change the cd in the transport). BUT, if I am giving up even a good bit of sound quality going the computer based path, it makes no sense to go that route

I do not intend for this to be a ******* match about computer audio vs. traditional transports debate, but a simple what have your ears said to you when listening to fancy or not so fancy computer based devices compared hopefully with the Shigaclone, but can be with any other transport, dvd/cd/whatever has floated your boat over computer stuff.

Thanks all for your voice on experience and opinions.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2011, 09:10 AM   #2
Turbon is offline Turbon  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Turbon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: South
I use both plus vinyl on a Lenco L75!

Brgds
__________________
These are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2011, 02:14 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbon View Post
I use both plus vinyl on a Lenco L75!

Brgds
What is your computer based setup and how is it compared to the Shigaclone? I guess I'm trying to get a solid concept of just what one needs to do in the computer audio world to get a sound as good, better, etc. than the Shigaclone.
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2011, 09:47 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Any others?[help=][/help]
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2011, 09:52 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
How about Kenny's mods on the Hiface.
http://www.digitalaudioreview.net.au...ech-hiface-mk2
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2011, 09:58 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
I know all about nearly every offering out there. I'm just looking for others that have and/or are using a Shigaclone or similarly good transport vs. ANY computer based setup and their thoughts.
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2011, 10:06 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Israel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbon View Post
I use both plus vinyl on a Lenco L75!

Brgds
How would you compare the 2 transports?
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2011, 10:13 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
I have directly compared 2 different shigaclone builds into a variety of DACs (Peter Daniels NOS premium, buffalo 2 with salas shunt supplies and counterpoint output stages, EUVL 9022 dac, pass D1 clone) vs the 2 jkeny DACs (jkDAC and jkDAC32) platying from a laptop using wav/flac files and jplay.

The shigaclone comes in a close second to either of the jkeny DACS. The shiga is a fine player though, and if you prefer handling CDs and don't like PCs/laptops, back ups and so on, its a great way to go. That's of course assuming you can find a donor transport plus build the dac to match.

Disclaimer: I'm a friend of jkeny.


Fran
__________________
Visit www.tirnahifi.org!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2011, 10:32 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by woodturner-fran View Post
I have directly compared 2 different shigaclone builds into a variety of DACs (Peter Daniels NOS premium, buffalo 2 with salas shunt supplies and counterpoint output stages, EUVL 9022 dac, pass D1 clone) vs the 2 jkeny DACs (jkDAC and jkDAC32) platying from a laptop using wav/flac files and jplay.

The shigaclone comes in a close second to either of the jkeny DACS. The shiga is a fine player though, and if you prefer handling CDs and don't like PCs/laptops, back ups and so on, its a great way to go. That's of course assuming you can find a donor transport plus build the dac to match.

Disclaimer: I'm a friend of jkeny.


Fran
If you give a fair and true unbiased opinion, would you still say the same as above? I ask because I am very much interested in the JKDAC. I may have to PM you with regards with which JKenny DAC you prefer more and which you will be selling to me since you do not really need two around now do ya mate?

Cheers!
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2011, 10:50 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
I don't have either at the moment - I had both on test! As regards the true and fair bit, well, really you're gonna just have to take it or leave it! I say its true, but how would you know if I'm not lying and a shill! Again the disclaimer - I'm a friend of his and have had (him &) his products here many times. No matter how I put the "disclaimer" its going to be seen by many as shilling. I just saw your post and knew that very few if anyone would have heard both side by side and thought I'd reply. Perhaps a mod should have a look at this and remove any bits they are uncomfortable with.

Feel free to pm, but I'd say shoot jkeny an email via his website and ask him for more details.


Fran
__________________
Visit www.tirnahifi.org!!
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
5.1 amplifier for computer audio d33cktr4zy Class D 3 31st July 2009 03:17 PM
Computer audio conundrum! lemans23 Everything Else 0 11th June 2007 02:08 AM
Computer heatsinks for audio deleveld Solid State 7 1st December 2004 05:11 PM
F/s Computer And Car Audio! FRITO Swap Meet 1 26th May 2003 02:34 AM
Computer Audio Processing (VxD, WDM and DirectX Audio) Ignite Everything Else 1 3rd August 2001 05:08 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:51 PM.

Page generated in 0.11080 seconds (82.48% PHP - 17.52% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio