Best way to route patch wire (for clock signals)? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Source
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 18th January 2002, 07:22 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Finland
Default Best way to route patch wire (for clock signals)?


I just got the schematic for my DAC (a Cambridge S700 isodac) and the clock is organised in a very strange way (I'll write more about it later, I got to go to a meeting in a moment) so I'm going to more or less remove the clock circuity and and re do it with patch wires.

I just wondered, what's the best way to route the patch wires on the PCB?? Shortest possible route or orthogonally across the PCB??

Many thanks,

  Reply With Quote
Old 18th January 2002, 10:41 AM   #2
alfsch is offline alfsch  Germany
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: augsburg
Default clock

You should use shortest way possible. Clock gen beside the DAC is best, then via buffer to rest of chips (dig. filter, controller...).
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2002, 06:55 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Finland
Default Sounds better now...

Thanks - I did the work and the sound is much better now. I just routed the patch wires, more or less, the shortest route...

And this is what I did...

The S700 DAC uses a CS8412 reviever, PMD100 filter and SAA7350 DAC. However, things were quite strange in the clock department, partly because the thing has an optical clock output which enables it to sync to a Cambridge CD transport - There was a 16.??MHz crystal on board for this purpose. What happend was the clock from the 8412 was buffered and fed to the PMD100 but instead of sending the clock straight to the SAA7350, a W42C70 frequency multiplier was used to generate a 16MHz clock for the DAC. The Specs say that the jitter on output of this chip is 500ps!

The clock signals also went through a few gates which were used to select which clock source the SAA7350 would use. What I did was to remove the W42C70 and the gates for selecting the clock source and run the DAC straight off the buffered clock from the 8412. I also had to tell the SAA7350 to expect a 256Fs clock, rather than 384Fs.

After these changes the sound was more open and the stereo image better defined. A tweaker's job is never done, thought, so a couple of days later I modified the reciever's loop filter according to wildmonkeysects' ideas and this improved the sound further!

Now I'm totally happy - Almost - Now I gust want to Gen lock the DAC to my transport and replace the SAA7350 with a decent DAC...


  Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2002, 12:55 PM   #4
KVV is offline KVV
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ukraine
Default SAA7350


I can`t find a datasheet for SAA7350 and I see, that You have a schematic of Your Cambrige S700. Could You send me a pic with part of Your schematic with SAA7350 pinout and post filter. I would like to modify my old Marantz CD72.
My opinion, that it`s not the least DAC, and in a good environment it sounds not bad. In my case I can compare it with TEAC VRDS-25(with AD1862, still not modified yet). Sounds are different, but I can`t say that one is absolutely better than other. It depends of feeling and daytime. Try before place a new DAC finally. Might be that something will appear, but something will miss.

my best regards,kvv
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2004, 10:47 AM   #5
Stones is offline Stones  United States
diyAudio Member
Stones's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NC
Default Cambridge Audio S700 circuit diagram

I have stumbled across one of these and before I rip the pcb out and start again I would like to see what can be done with this dac.

Provisionally, the psu looks rubbish the clock is mad and let’s not mention the output stage.

My question to you all is where can I lay my eyes on a circuit diagram. And does anyone have any suggestions regarding improving this unit. (apart from starting again).
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2004, 12:29 PM   #6
JohnW is offline JohnW  Czech Republic
diyAudio Member
JohnW's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Discovery Bay, Prague, Paris...
Be very careful when judging Phase Noise performance simply from Jitter Specs. In realty due to the low clock multiplication ratio of 1.5, the RMS jitter is about 50pS. However, the real beauty of the jitter is the spectrum is now almost completely random, i.e. no signal correlated artefacts. If you’re going to have jitter – then have random phase noise.

The best is no jitter – so use the clock-lock function – you need to modify your transport / CD player to accept a 128Fs (5.6448MHz) clock input - and then use the optical SPDIF (for RF isolation between CD and DAC) for the Audio data, as jitter is no longer an issue.

I would not operate the SAA7350 at 256fs, as its noise shaper performance is much worse then in 384fs mode.

The ISOMAGIC design does not use the SAA7350 internal opamps, instead external AD712’s are used – these still perform well in the presence of Noise-Shaper RF. Once the external opamps are used, SAA7350 becomes a completely different beast.

The 5534's on the PCB are used for low noise voltage references – as such, they offer very good performance. A massive sound improvement was obtained when the AD711's differential summers and output buffering where changed to a simple discrete design – but Clock-Lock first.

Once the above have been performed, the next best gain in performance can be had by improving the PSU section. Supply regulated +/- 15V to the board.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2004, 02:44 PM   #7
frenzic is offline frenzic  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
datasheet SAA7350
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2004, 03:37 PM   #8
Stones is offline Stones  United States
diyAudio Member
Stones's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NC
Originally posted by frenzic
datasheet SAA7350
the link does not work.

Thanks guys But, where can I lay my eyes on a circuit diagram.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2004, 05:37 PM   #9
dhaen is offline dhaen  Europe
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
dhaen's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: U.K.
The link works sometimes. I copied it to here:
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th May 2007, 09:55 PM   #10
JKoch is offline JKoch  Poland
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Gdansk
Hi JohnW

I'm looking for any details how to improve sound from my Philips CD950 (SAA7350). As I wrote in your post you did many changes in your DAC. Could you give me more details, schematic or links about clock and filter for the SAA7350?

  Reply With Quote


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to patch a torn speaker? syntrax Multi-Way 3 1st December 2006 08:49 PM
Cone Patch/Repair? Aesthetikz Multi-Way 5 18th September 2006 01:42 PM
The 'Tater Patch valveitude Tubes / Valves 17 13th July 2005 02:04 PM
lol the patch.exe from micorsoft karma Everything Else 1 2nd October 2003 05:46 PM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:44 AM.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2017 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2