|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
|
Pin-compatible to AD1896, looks like significantly lower THD. Dynamic range is a little better. More freedom for master clock (up to 50MHz) and it seems this solves the master mode at 192kHz problem. Also supports 16:1 and 1:16 ratios.
http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folder...t/src4192.html I'm just glad it fits on my boards.
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: *
|
Quote:
looks good... FFT's with the "grass" down at -160dB and nothing else to speak of! But where is the jitter attenuation data such as dig PLL (servo loop) lowpass response ???? This is very important. Terry |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SRC4192 Use... | MWP | Digital Source | 33 | 26th April 2005 07:17 PM |
| SRC4192's are on the way... :) | Tieftoener | Digital Source | 27 | 25th November 2003 08:36 PM |
| AD1896 vs SRC4192 | Marek | Digital Source | 4 | 8th November 2003 07:05 PM |
| ASRC Comparison ? | ftorres | Digital Source | 4 | 20th February 2002 02:33 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06947 seconds (68.86% PHP - 31.14% MySQL) with 10 queries |