Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Source
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 13th August 2003, 07:49 PM   #1
bqc is offline bqc
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Diego,CA
Default is this why oversampling is not good

The bottom trace in the picture below shows the music that came out of the CD line out
of a Marrantz CD5000 which uses a TDA1549 with 4X oversampling.

The top trace came from patching into the I2S lines before
it gets to the TDA1549 and feeding them to the inputs of a
TDA 1543 Non OS DAC. The I/V conversion is done using an opamp per data sheet. Although the 2 traces are inverted with
respect to each other, one can see that the top trace is smoother
while the botton trace has jagged edges. Is this why oversampling sounds so harsh?
Unfortunately, I was not able to fully listen to the new NON OS sound since
my CD player starts messing up once I got everything hooked up.
It plays for a seconds, and stop for a couple seconds with static
noises and starts again for a seconds and stops again for a few
seconds with statics and over and over. I unhook all the patch
cables and put the CD player back to the way it was and it
still messed up. Anybody have any idea what could have gone
wrong? Is patching into the I2S caused the master clock to
become totally messed up? Do I need to build a new master clock?

Also when I build the I/V conversion using opamp per
spec, the sound is so soft. I had to replace the spec 1.2K feedback resistor with 66K to get any decent volume.
The Rbias is 3.3K. ANybody knows why the sound is so soft
using spec feedback resistor? Did the datasheet intend for the output
of the I/V opamp to be fed through another opamp for additional
voltage gain?
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg strace5.jpeg (46.8 KB, 614 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2003, 10:26 PM   #2
haldor is offline haldor  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Looking at those waveforms I'd say the top traces indicate some serious high pass roll off going on. Either problems in the I-V or a really poor layout.

I think the differences between a competently implemented non-os and os DAC is not going to be enough to be grossly visible on your scope. Got access to a spectrum analyser? Hook it up and I expect you will see that the top traces have a very impared high frequency response. That may sound good for some kinds of music, but I prefer to use tone controls that I can adjust.

Phil
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th August 2003, 03:34 PM   #3
fedde is offline fedde  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Eindhoven, the Netherlands
Send a message via ICQ to fedde
If you feed the I2S lines of your CD-5000 to a TDA1543, you'll not have a non-os DAC! The oversampling is in the controller, not in the TDA1549...

Fedde
__________________
http://www.fedde.nu, gainclone and non-oversampling DAC audio projects and kits...
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th August 2003, 03:53 PM   #4
ojg is offline ojg
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norway
Default Re: is this why oversampling is not good

Quote:
Originally posted by bqc
Also when I build the I/V conversion using opamp per
spec, the sound is so soft. I had to replace the spec 1.2K feedback resistor with 66K to get any decent volume.
Do you also use a capacitor in parallell with the I/V feedback resistor? If so then you also need to reduce the value of this capacitor (by the same amount) otherwise you will get HF rolloff.

A 66k feedback resistor is way too much!!! The 1.2k as in the datasheet should be fine as this would give you 2.3mA*1.2kohm=2.76Vpeak output, I think the problem is somewhere else in your system...
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th August 2003, 12:47 AM   #5
bqc is offline bqc
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Diego,CA
I did parrallel the feedback resistors with caps per data sheet.
You are right that there must be something else wrong in my
system. I think the low level is caused by the fact that
the data in the I2S lines are 4X oversampled as Fedde pointed
out .
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th August 2003, 07:05 AM   #6
rbroer is offline rbroer  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
rbroer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Netherlands
BQC,

Read following thread completely:

Hint: I2S versus Jap. input format.


__________________
Rudolf Broertjes
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NOS DAC with oversampling - anybody done it? oon_the_kid Digital Line Level 66 31st July 2009 02:38 PM
what is 1x oversampling amp builder jb Digital Source 4 25th July 2005 02:38 PM
TDA5141 oversampling or non-oversampling ? Bernhard Digital Source 4 1st September 2004 10:27 AM
Non-Oversampling DAC lucpes Digital Source 42 6th July 2004 03:06 AM
Non Oversampling Vs Oversampling jkeny Digital Source 25 9th April 2002 07:50 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:45 PM.

Page generated in 0.08183 seconds (78.76% PHP - 21.24% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio