XMOS-based Asynchronous USB to I2S interface - Page 24 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Source

Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 3rd December 2011, 01:24 AM   #231
reo is offline reo  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: st-philippe de laprairie
Quote:
Originally Posted by reo View Post
For such a high price for that cchd-957 one would assume it was better than...
Having the NDK on this card it's one less thing to ponder on .

On another note . , i have installed a standalone 5V regulator replacing my PC'S usb2 output to WaveIO, it was not necessary after all, similar quality sound coming out either way. My PC's power supply is highly efficient and never drifted enough to substantiate a standalone regulator, least now i know, next thing i will try out is, isolating my usb2 cables from the pc with it's own standalone 5V, that's if it has noise, i wonder about that as well ,PH. regulators vs Trident might yield different results,i use them to control Mojo2 and that's another story . i'm thinking this card is already up to snuff, if one is in synchronous mode and use a separate regulator driving the card if incoming power supply is questionable, then both mods are a worthwhile move to reduce noise.
regards
rol
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2011, 09:32 AM   #232
diyAudio Member
 
triode_al's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Westland
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4est View Post
Upgrading clocks is certainly an option, but one needs to be careful on their selection. The specs on the clock may not tell the whole story. A case can be made for an isolated power supply and clock too.
Would a TENT VXCO clock (Guido Tent) of 11.28960 not be a perfect replacement? Extreme low jitter. The separate power supply can be bought too. You can use his special high frequency shunts too.
For playback of standard CD's (44.1 KHz and occasional special recordings of 88.2 KHz) this replacing the main clock is enough to start off.
Own recorded (i.e. sampled LP's) can stick with the other clock - that is used anyway to record if I understand correctly). This then is a later candidate.
  • Should the 12.0000 MHz clock have to be replaced too?

albert
__________________
DAC TDA1541 S1; Kondo post-I/V filter; MC30-Super --> two stage RIAA; Pre: Kaneda ; F5 ; 300B PP ; ESL 57
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2011, 12:44 PM   #233
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
11.28960 MHz would not be a replacement for any osc on that board. You'll need oscillators with two values only: 22.5792 MHz and 24.576 Mhz.
13 MHz (not 12 Mhz) crystal replacement: it's used by XMOS's PLL to lift the internal freq at 400 MHz. If you want, you can replace the whole circuit with any 13 MHz oscillator you like that works at 3.3V (to take advantage of on-board PSU) though, taking into consideration the internal XMOS architecture, all the signals are realigned using the corresponding Master clock signal which in WaveIO's case are: 22.5792 MHz and 22.576 MHz parts.
Cheers,
L
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2011, 12:51 PM   #234
diyAudio Member
 
triode_al's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Westland
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lorien View Post
11.28960 MHz would not be a replacement for any osc on that board. You'll need oscillators with two values only: 22.5792 MHz and 24.576 Mhz.
13 MHz (not 12 Mhz) crystal replacement: it's used by XMOS's PLL to lift the internal freq at 400 MHz. If you want, you can replace the whole circuit with any 13 MHz oscillator you like that works at 3.3V (to take advantage of on-board PSU) though, taking into consideration the internal XMOS architecture, all the signals are realigned using the corresponding Master clock signal which in WaveIO's case are: 22.5792 MHz and 22.576 MHz parts.
Cheers,
L
I see. Had it wrong in my head
Then as TENT XO, there is indeed available 22.5792 MHz and 24.5760 MHz . Is that better then, can these be fed from a separate supply without disturbing the existing architecture?
Or is the advantage limited?
albert
__________________
DAC TDA1541 S1; Kondo post-I/V filter; MC30-Super --> two stage RIAA; Pre: Kaneda ; F5 ; 300B PP ; ESL 57
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2011, 01:15 PM   #235
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
PSUs can be improved but you have to desolder the main oscillators (22.5792 and 24.576) from WaveIO board using a hot air station (preferably). Also, I could leave them unmounted, at your request. This way, you can build your nice setup on top of WaveIO board using the shortest connections you're able to provide.
Limits: WaveIO has common ground with the source and this is something I will address on the revision. Even so, in my opinion it worths the try.
L
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2011, 02:46 PM   #236
regal is offline regal  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: MD
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4est View Post
Upgrading clocks is certainly an option, but one needs to be careful on their selection. The specs on the clock may not tell the whole story. A case can be made for an isolated power supply and clock too.
-with hirez asynch usb where the usb ground(computer) is shared with the clocks power supply, I think there is a limit of return as far as clock quality. The power supply regulation is only as good as its reference which in case of hirez asynch usb isn't going to be spectacular even with a separate power supply it really isn't separate. Until there comes a reliable USB 2.0 480 isolation for asynch operation this will be an issue with all these devices.

Now RBCD asynch USB1.0 is a whole different ballgame where the isolation on the asynch side is reliable and proven, this opens up an entirely different realm of quality. For example IME a usb side isolated asynch USB1.0 to spdif device I bought sounds better with dithered/downsampled hdtracks than my other non usb side isolated asynch USB2.0 to galvanically isolated i2s device.

This is why I still think we are jumping the gun with USB2.0 "hi-rez" usb, should be designing and optimizing USB1.0 asynch USB RBCD, but unfortunately hirez marketing sells with these things (even if it doesn't as far as actual music.)
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th December 2011, 10:46 PM   #237
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Davis,CA
Default Working Synchronously

Thanks to all your help I was able to muster the courage and hook up Lucian's XMOS board's clock to my Buffalo II. Works well.

The only unexpected outcome is that the Volumite stopped working. I think it gets a clock feed from the BII. Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Best

Bob
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th December 2011, 12:53 AM   #238
reo is offline reo  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: st-philippe de laprairie
strange , i re installed Volumite to see if it works, and it does ., maybe in your case it's a broken connection from BII to Volumite.
regards
rol
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th December 2011, 01:28 AM   #239
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Default No problem

using the Volumite here with synchronous clocking. Maybe you should re-check all connections.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th December 2011, 01:46 AM   #240
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Davis,CA
Will do

I checked for 5V at the volumite - will check the other two connections
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
exaU2I - Multi-Channel Asynchronous USB to I2S Interface exa065 exaDevices 1357 3rd March 2014 08:51 PM
Introducing miniStreamer: Native 24/96 USB to I2S / SPDIF interface minidsp miniDSP 39 5th January 2014 11:00 PM
Ultimate USB to I2S interface sampler Digital Source 206 30th January 2012 03:45 PM
Is it possible to develop a ASIO driver for PCM2900 based USB Audio interface? cxhawk Digital Source 7 3rd December 2010 02:30 PM
interface I2S with USB mermoz Digital Source 0 21st February 2003 10:34 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:25 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2