|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: usa
|
Denon DCD S10 (2 AD8620, 4 opa627BP, 8 opa637BP, Elso kwak clock 6)
Rotel 855 (non/os, 2 AD8620 ,Elso kwak 7) Magnavox CD650(non/os, 2 AD8620, TDA1541A S1) When I listen some violin CD, I fell the Rotel 855 and Magnavox CD650 are sweeter than the Denon DCD S10, but listen femal voice the Denon DCD S10 is less harsh than the Rotel 855 and Magnavox CD650. Will the TDA1543 nos/os be less harsh than TDA1541A nos/os? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Netherlands
|
Did you change the analog filter when you made the cdplayer non os ?
__________________
It's only audio |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: usa
|
I just changed the two NE5532s on non/os Rotel 855 and Magnavox CD650. Should I build a new I/V stage?
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Eindhoven
|
Quote:
I'd reconsider a new analog filter regards |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Netherlands
|
When you make a TDA15xx cdplayer non os the analog filter has to be recalculated. Use the Search function for more info, there are threads about the subject. The harshness comes very likely from the unchanged filters, it has nothing to do with the used chip.
When you're brave please listen to the cdplayers once without analog filtering. So use the opamps but remove filter components. When the harshness is gone you have an indication you're on the right path. Warning: I wouldn't recommend to listen without analog filtering permanently. There could be ( there are in fact ) some RF components in the output signal that might disturb your amp. That being said I can tell I use only 6 dB/oct filtering with TDA1543 non os DAC's and I get away with it. Although I haven't built it, the discrete outputstage Rbroer designed looks promising and it is simple to build. Should be better than a opamp stage anyway.
__________________
It's only audio |
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Banned
|
Quote:
What is the crossoverpoint (-3dB) of your 6dB/octave filter?
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
www.audiosector.com “Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Banned
|
Quote:
Hi Mikeliu, I was never able to elicit any harsh sounds from the TDA1541! In fact I found it too mellow, "polite", uninvolving.... The TDA1541 does not sound harsh, NON-OS, in my Phlips CD-650 with orginal analog filtering still implemented, that is for oversampling. If you find the TDA1541 harsh you will find the TDA1543 unbearable....... I am not familiar with the AD8620 yet. May I suggest using the OPA2604 instead? Especially as a IV-converter it can't be beaten I think. I tried a lot of IC's ! ![]() Just a thought: You did lower the supply voltage to +/- 12V for the AD8620 in these players?
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Netherlands
|
Quote:
Quote:
Elso, one DAC has a filter with -3 dB at 48 kHz just to prevent very high frequencies from going in my amp. Never bothered to implement sinx/x filtering. I don't have any problem with the high roll off. To be honest, most of my TDA1543 dac's didn't have filtering at all. Maybe I put 2 caps at the output of that series just for peace of mind
__________________
It's only audio |
||
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Banned
|
Quote:
I suggest the chip I have very good results with |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| harsh query | steve04 | Multi-Way | 2 | 9th December 2008 12:25 PM |
| db6501 too harsh is there anythng I can do? | Yanibm1 | Car Audio | 1 | 3rd March 2008 05:43 AM |
| nad 3020i harsh sound | mad_z | Solid State | 14 | 24th August 2007 04:45 PM |
| Harsh sounding amp | zeus_threat | Solid State | 45 | 9th April 2006 04:30 PM |
| fe167 harsh | tenderland | Full Range | 33 | 15th February 2005 02:02 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.14199 seconds (83.10% PHP - 16.90% MySQL) with 10 queries |