|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New Jersey
|
After living the last couple of years with disc initialization problems on my Proceed PDT3 transport I was fortunate enough to track down someone who had done a lot of work with these old Philips CDM mechanisms and had all the parts and test equipment to effect a repair.
In my case all that was necessary was the replacement of the caps on the servo board, and a realignment and refocusing of the swing arm and laser. I got it back and it works fine, but it doesn't seem to sound quite the same. Is it possible that replacing the servo caps could explain this? The originals were Nichicon VX types, which were replaced with Panasonic FM. I know that I shouldn't really make any judgements on sound until the devices are fully burned in, but right now I think I'm getting a slight bit of harshness. I did a bit of research and subsequently found that this is a characteristic of the FM caps, but would this be an audible effect from changing them in a servo circuit? If so I'm a bit worried. I was hoping to get my PDT3 repaired but sounding as great as it always did. If this is due to these caps, is it something which will work itself out after device forming and burn in? Should I consider this an issue and look for which caps would be a better replacement? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Den Haag
|
You have been listening to decades old caps that needed replacing: now you're listening to brand new ones. I'd wait until they have made a few hours
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New Jersey
|
Quote:
I guess I was wondering if cap selection for a servo circuit could have as much of an impact as for signal carrying parts of a design.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
|
New caps could have ESR which is too low, do you have a scope to check the supply rails for oscillation ?
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New Jersey
|
Jon, the main power supply rails? If so then yes, the fellow who did the work checked the rails afterwards on a scope. He did not indicate there were any problems. Maybe I should ask specifically about this.
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
|
Yes, check the rails wherever the capacitors were replaced (with the unit playing).
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CDM1 Mk.II wear indicators? | tonyptony | Digital Source | 12 | 6th August 2010 08:47 AM |
| Classic Aragon (2004, 2004 MK II, 4004, 4004 MK II ) problems, experience and repairs | MagicMarksy | Solid State | 1 | 22nd May 2010 03:36 PM |
| Thorens 320 MK II question from noob. . . | mefistofelez | Analogue Source | 2 | 19th March 2007 10:11 PM |
| Gumby MK II !! | Andy G | Multi-Way | 1 | 19th July 2005 03:39 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08290 seconds (72.82% PHP - 27.18% MySQL) with 10 queries |