|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
Hello everyone, I want some expert opinions on swaping a PCM1796 with a PCM1795, as i read on TI specs sheet, both are the same pin configuration and pin by pin compatible, the only difference is that the PCM1795 is 32 bit DAC, I am thinking do this mod to the SONY XA-5400ES SACD PLAYER.
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hangzhou - Marco Polo's 'most beautiful city'. 700yrs is a long time though...
Blog Entries: 46
|
I've just pulled up the two datasheets side by side on my monitor (its widescreen
). The two parts look identical - even the plots of noise are indistinguishable. Given there's only 16 bits on a CD, the difference between 24 and 32bits in the DAC is pure marketing. I suggest finding an upgrade which is going to make a sonic difference and doesn't require desoldering and re-soldering a fine-pitched chip.<edit> - the giveaway is on page 53 of the PCM1795 datasheet - see if you can spot the intentional mistake
__________________
I think ideas are what you want to get rid of. I don't really like songs with ideas. - Leonard Cohen Last edited by abraxalito; 3rd July 2010 at 04:31 AM. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I would love to know if this works.
Joe R.
__________________
The "Elsinore Project" DIY Speaker System Webmaster: Custom Analogue Audio, JLTi and... "The Linear Current Loudspeaker" |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Virginia
|
I think the the only change in 1795 is the input buffer. Was made large, compatible with 32 bit so it would accept that with no confusion. But right after that, it gets truncated to 24 bit and runs in the same pathway like on the 1796.
So... unless you have a DSP or other device outputting 32 bit (and no flexibility to change it to 24 bit) ahead of DAC, it is pointless to go this route. There is no quality improvement whatsoever. PS: To mod a DSD player with that would be pointless from other reason too - DSD signal is 1 bit, has nothing to do with 32 bit PCM. |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| My first DAC, CS8415/PCM1796 based | DragosB | Digital Source | 6 | 2nd November 2006 03:58 PM |
| Replacing a diaphragm | andyshriver | Multi-Way | 0 | 23rd October 2005 02:08 AM |
| Replacing Valves | Tom Smithson | Tubes / Valves | 1 | 19th October 2004 02:20 AM |
| PCM1796 or DSD1796 | macboy | Digital Source | 3 | 26th May 2004 09:29 PM |
| Replacing Chip | soundNERD | Chip Amps | 3 | 9th February 2004 08:40 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07467 seconds (66.89% PHP - 33.11% MySQL) with 10 queries |