|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
... as I have a player here with a faulty PCM1792A - it looks like an A version as it has a capital A under a map of Texas. Can get a 1792 non-A and repair this thing on Monday.
The player uses double DACs, one per channel, Left channel DAC has got a DC offset and kaput, Right channel works fine. So must replace Left. Help much appreciated. Cheers. Joe R.
__________________
The "Elsinore Project" DIY Speaker System Webmaster: Custom Analogue Audio, JLTi and... "The Linear Current Loudspeaker" |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Yeah I know, but will non-A repair this machine or not. Have anybody actually done the substitution? There are 1792 in stock out there, from the local Farnell who has no stock of A.
Cheers. Joe R.
__________________
The "Elsinore Project" DIY Speaker System Webmaster: Custom Analogue Audio, JLTi and... "The Linear Current Loudspeaker" |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Virginia
|
They look identical in specs. Maybe A-type is lead-free?
Shoot an email to TI... see what they say. Last edited by SoNic_real_one; 2nd July 2010 at 05:58 PM. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
Try the PCM1795, they are pin for pin the same
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
Try the PCM1795, they are both pin by pin the same
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Thanks for the suggestions, but I can get my hands on a PCM1792 on Monday and fix the player without delay. It seems that the PCM1792A is a replacement for PCM1792?
Cheers. Joe R.
__________________
The "Elsinore Project" DIY Speaker System Webmaster: Custom Analogue Audio, JLTi and... "The Linear Current Loudspeaker" |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
Good to know, if you want to upgrade in the future have in mind the PCM1795 is a 32 bit DAC.
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
I know of somebody who tried replace PCM1796 with PCM1795 and reportedly it did not work? Not 100% sure, just heard about it. There are lots of players out there using PCM1796, so anybody would like to try out PCM1795 and report back here, that would be interesting. Cheers, Joe
__________________
The "Elsinore Project" DIY Speaker System Webmaster: Custom Analogue Audio, JLTi and... "The Linear Current Loudspeaker" |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I just asked an eBay seller and got the following answer:
"Yes, the PCM1792 can be used to replace PCM1792A, just a little difference in spec: PCM1792 has 132dB SNR, but the PCM1792A is 127dB SNR" Is that the only difference and why T-I only recommends 1792A in new players, no other reason? I don't hear much difference between PCM1792(A) and PCM1796 - I think the architecture which is shared is the most important contributor to sound, not the nth degree of SNR. Any comments? Joe R.
__________________
The "Elsinore Project" DIY Speaker System Webmaster: Custom Analogue Audio, JLTi and... "The Linear Current Loudspeaker" |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Volume control using PCM1792A (digital) or WM8816 (analog)? | vcelkamaja | Digital Line Level | 0 | 26th April 2010 07:53 AM |
| DAC with DIR9001 & PCM1792A (fist digital project) | dock | Digital Line Level | 13 | 29th November 2008 12:41 AM |
| Pcm1792 | luc888 | Digital Source | 0 | 25th September 2006 05:22 PM |
| PCM1792A vs. PCM1792 + influence of oversampling on THD etc. | capslock | Digital Source | 2 | 31st March 2004 06:37 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10491 seconds (78.35% PHP - 21.65% MySQL) with 10 queries |