|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: U.K.
|
Hi,
I'm just trying to decide whether to try a non-OS DAC. What are the opinions on how low the residual 44.1KHz can be made without impacting on the audio passband (ripple, group delay etc)? What is a feasible figure in dB below operating level, or better below dBF? TIA Cheers, |
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Previously: Kuei Yang Wang
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Somewhere nice on planet earth
|
Koinichiwa,
Quote:
If the output waveform of the DAC is a propper ideal staircase than 40KHz as result of the sinc function will be down by 20db. However this "ideal" sinc curve will be blurred by non-ideal staircase (non-zero settling time of DAC) output. Now, if you add my favoured "peaking" 3rd order lowpass you get an offset of the -3db @ 20KHz at the price of 90 degree Phaselag at 20KHz and a 3rd order rolloff above that, making 40KHz including the sinc function around -20db to -30db depending how fast the DAC settles. IN MY PERSONAL VIEW such a level of attenuation of the first image suffices if well designed equipment is used. I'd even go as far as saying that the simpler LCR resonant Anti Sinc Circuit previously discussed with a 1st order LPF @ 44KHz combined with the sinc rolloff should be enough.... Sayonara |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Warp Engineer
On Holiday
|
Quote:
If you email it to the webmaster account I might be able to put it on the server for you.
__________________
- Dan |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Previously: Kuei Yang Wang
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Somewhere nice on planet earth
|
Koinichiwa Webmeister San,
U GOT MAIL. Sayonara |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Warp Engineer
On Holiday
|
I'm downloading the email now... It's time for bed so I'll put it up on the server tomorrow.
__________________
- Dan |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Previously: Kuei Yang Wang
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Somewhere nice on planet earth
|
Koinichiwa Webmeister San,
The mail failed..... <p.....10@////.com>: 17.250.248.49 failed after I sent the message. Remote host said: 552 5.2.3 Message exceeds maximum fixed size (3145727) (the e-mail addy was altered to throw off spambots....) I uploaded the zip to here for temprary parking: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Thunde...files/SINC.zip Sayonara |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: U.K.
|
KYW,
If it's alright, I've put it here: http://www.dhaen.org.uk/kyw/kyw.htm I'll provide a more elegant link later.. e&oe Jo mata |
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Previously: Kuei Yang Wang
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Somewhere nice on planet earth
|
Koinichiwa,
Quote:
Sayonara |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: U.K.
|
KYW,
I must say, the problem seems less than I'd thought. The levels you quoted: were they below operating level? If so, which one Please tell me in dBF.Okagesama-de, John (Nihon-go wa honto omoshiroi desu-ne) |
|
|
|
#10 | |||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Serbia
|
Hello Dhaen,
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Check these pages, show the effectiveness of a few non-o/s filtering approaches (four are multiple notches, one is 3rd order low pass). Pedja |
|||
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How do you remove flux residue after soldering? | 777funk | Construction Tips | 40 | 25th September 2010 11:31 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10751 seconds (81.29% PHP - 18.71% MySQL) with 11 queries |