|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
|
Which caps do you use after regs?
I ask as I've read Rubycon ZA/ZL's are ideal after regs but I've also read that low esr caps are not good after regs. ZA's are low esr so which is correct? ZA's = good/bad? Ta. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
|
Ah bugger it, seems ZA's are a bad idea after regs.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
|
It depends on what the regulator is, what the loading is, and what your preference is. A universal answer does not exist.
__________________
Here's looking at you, kid. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Virginia
|
Low ESR caps are not good on the power lines, regardless of the location (before or after regs). Inductance of the power strips coupled with capacitance under variable load creates oscillations that need to be damped. Usually, the "normal" ESR values are enough to do that damping, but if you go on the low ESR route, there will be some ringing or worse.
Low ESR caps are to be used only series with the signal or where are employed means to damp the oscillations. Or oscillations don't matter - switched PS. |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
|
Quote:
Shame really, I trusted the judgement of a fellow member on this forum who also owns/runs a upgrade website/shop facilty and even states on his site that ZA's are ideal after regs. Nevermind, you live and learn I suppose. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
With apologies to SoNic_real_one as I know we are at odds over decoupling issues.
Perhaps the answer is to actually fit some of each type and do some real measurements rather than just taking everything on trust. At least the low e.s.r. types offer the intriguing possibility (based on the above) of the performance improving as the caps age and e.s.r. increases... does this explain the fad of burning in exotic parts... the "newness" soon wears off.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------- A simulation free zone. Design it, build it, test it. |
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
|
Quote:
If you can't trust a so called 'audio engineer', who can you trust? I thought a diy audio forum that consists of thousands of members might be a good place to start, guess not. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Virginia
|
There are 2 kinds of audio "afficiando".
- The ones that trust the measurements, the electrical and acoustical theories, try to understand them, their limitations and work with them to achieve better designs. - The ones that don't understand the science behind all this, they prefer to disregard all the measurements and scientific theories and rely on word of the mouth in choosing their equipment/designs. They are actually a special kind of "belivers" in religion-like "audiophile" legends, in a certain "magic" that cannot be quantifyed in formulas. One just have to choose a side... |
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
|
Quote:
Oh well, folk do push what they sell. Ne'mind, |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
|
Hi nad, caps don't have a 'sound quality' as such, so ignore those who try to sell you an idea (or actual part) based upon the notion of components having such a quality.
What caps have are electrical characteristics which you have to manipulate to get what you want out of the circuit. I think there are three approaches to this... 1) learn all about impedance, reactance, and power supply decoupling, then buy some test kit and measure things accurately, or 2) read up on the subject from knowledgeable people and then try a few experiments (...low esr cap + 1 Ohm in series, low esr cap + 2 Ohms in series, etc., etc.) or 3) just 'hit and hope'. However number 3 is a receipe for frustration! It probably comes down to maintaining the output impedance of the regulator over an extended band-width, while ensuring good transient response. There were a couple of good documents on the web about the subject but unfortunately I did not note the references. ![]() Buying a few low ohm resistors to experiment in series with your low esr caps might be an idea. Good luck. |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Super Regs | underwurlde | Power Supplies | 47 | 7th October 2009 02:34 PM |
| Why are they building -15v regs | RCruz | Power Supplies | 16 | 14th December 2008 10:14 PM |
| Audiocom super regs | t. | Digital Source | 10 | 20th April 2007 04:16 AM |
| NP caps after 78xx regs ? (+schem) | redrabbit | Power Supplies | 0 | 14th January 2007 08:28 PM |
| fixed regs | pete.a | Everything Else | 0 | 31st January 2004 11:58 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12871 seconds (80.23% PHP - 19.77% MySQL) with 11 queries |