|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: California
|
I've spent the last couple of days reading up on clocks, clock power supply improvements, and asynchronous reclocking of DAC inputs to improve jitter. Mostly, I've read the works posted by Elso and Guido, which is perhaps not exhaustive on this topic.
However, I also came across several articles published in The Audio Amateur from 1994-1995, entitled, "Digital Audio Jitter: RIP?". There are 4 similar articles, written by Youtsey. In these articles, the author based his modifications around the AD1891 sample rate converter chip, and also adds additional flip flops to reclock signals. So, my question is how does the asynchronous reclocking approach differ from the approach based on the AD1891 or similar sample rate converter technique? Thanks and regards, Rob Weinstock |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cheap Asynchronous USB | jkeny | Digital Line Level | 5 | 26th September 2009 12:24 PM |
| Asynchronous reclocking | Ulas | Digital Source | 62 | 24th January 2006 09:19 PM |
| Has anyone actually measured Elso's Asynchronous Reclocker? | pop11 | Digital Source | 5 | 17th March 2004 03:09 PM |
| Asynchronous reclocking problem | Andypairo | Digital Source | 11 | 23rd December 2003 10:46 AM |
| First attempt at asynchronous reclocking | Oli | Digital Source | 2 | 25th May 2003 01:38 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.25932 seconds (18.74% PHP - 81.26% MySQL) with 10 queries |