|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hoping someone might know the DAC used in the Sony CDP-350 cd player. Manufactured in 1987. I know in the 80's that Sony used both Philips and BB chips. I'm looking for a player with a current output dac for trying passive i/v.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: D-55629 Schwarzerden
|
Sony's CDP-333ESD use the TDA1541 (current output dac) - go to
Sony CDP338ESD Regarded the CDP-350 I guess, there are a PCM56P inside, but I am not sure. This URL shows additional CDP's with TDA1541: http://www.lampizator.eu/lampizator/...r/TDA1541.html Last edited by tiefbassuebertr; 2nd February 2010 at 08:44 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: D-55629 Schwarzerden
|
You prefer a SONY with TDA1541 instead a Philips with this DAC. Why?
The realibility and life time of laser units from Philips (e. g. CDM1-4) is much more better than from SONY. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
But the point of my looking at the Sony CDP-350 is for passive(resistor) i/v with tube srpp output , and I just want a CHEAP player to 'fix'
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
It's been a VERY long time since I've seen a CDP-350, but I am fairly sure it uses a single Sanyo LC7880 or LC7881 16bit dual dac chip w/4xOS filter. That was the first series of really cheaply made Sony players, and I think the first series to use the KSS-150, later replaced directly by the KSS-210. Not a terrible player at all, and not nearly the most cheaply made Sony player, but not exactly a desirable piece.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
It uses CXD1161(LC7880/7881) with DF CXD1162
__________________
"In developing audio devices we can always find creative non standart solutions that will ensure the best sound" (с) www.overture.org.ua |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
"In developing audio devices we can always find creative non standart solutions that will ensure the best sound" (с) www.overture.org.ua |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
If you had not made this statement ,I would have just put this player on the 'pile'. But you made me curious. I removed the op amps and disconnected surrounding traces. I made a direct connection to pins 1&20(rt/lft) via a poly cap I had available. I cannot believe how nice this LC7880(1) dac sounds. I made no other changes. I am amazed. Keep in mind that the output directly from the chip(voltage out) seems to be about 10db lower than with the LPF intact. It sounds full and sweet , with excellent treble. I have listened to this player(modded) for hours now , and I remain very impressed. I am really surprised this dac chip has not been mentioned around here. I can highly recommend giving this a try , especially since these chips are used in many cheap players. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sony CDP-D500 & CDP-2700 | audiobot | Digital Source | 2 | 20th December 2009 12:44 PM |
| Sony CDP-337ESD v Sony CDP-X33ES which is best? | eldarvanyar | Digital Source | 0 | 10th January 2008 12:04 PM |
| WTB: SONY CDP-X3000ES or CDP-X5000ES | cartman | Swap Meet | 0 | 18th April 2007 07:16 PM |
| Silicon chip studio 350: HELP NEEDED (please!) | 81gl | Solid State | 15 | 2nd October 2006 12:41 PM |
| Controller chip in Sony CDP-X707 | FaZ72 | Digital Source | 3 | 19th May 2004 09:19 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11967 seconds (78.19% PHP - 21.81% MySQL) with 11 queries |