OCXO 16.9344MHz LOW JITTER CLOCK

[szjyec]

do you have anyone use OCXO-16.9344M for CD play?

what about effect?

[szjyec]

this is photo ;
have anyone use ?

[szjyec]

¾§Òæµç×Ó£¨³ÏÐÅ+ÈÈÐÄ+ÓÅÖʾ§Õñ£©Íø¹ºµê- - ÌÔ±¦Íø

what about this ?

[Bill Fuss]

As far as I know using an OCXO in a music source is a total waste of money.

[szjyec]

This depends on your attitude, and used people to know. Heard that it is quite satisfactory results!

[Moddang]

Originally Posted by Bill Fuss

As far as I know using an OCXO in a music source is a total waste of money.

Why?

[Andrew Eckhardt]

Originally Posted by Moddang

Why?

It's not usual for extremely high frequency stability to be important for consumer audio compared to low jitter. Termperature controlled oscillators may operate at a specific frequency over a wide ambient temperature range but keeping the phase noise low is an entirely different problem.

[Moddang]

Originally Posted by Andrew Eckhardt

It's not usual for extremely high frequency stability to be important for consumer audio compared to low jitter. Termperature controlled oscillators may operate at a specific frequency over a wide ambient temperature range but keeping the phase noise low is an entirely different problem.

What we need? F stability or phase noise?

[Andrew Eckhardt]

Low phase noise is best. The particular running frequency of an isolated audio timing signal wont be noticed by a listener if it's off by 20ppm, or 100 ppm for that matter.

Putting an oscillator in an oven wont give low jitter, unless microHertz(milliHertz?) is part of the measured band. Wasted precision.

[szjyec]

Usually OCXO TCXO phase noise jitter than the aspect of a lot better, not a single stability OCXO TCXO better than that