|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Munich
|
I have built a differential oscillator and after testing a few mods, I could post a schematic if there is any interest.
The outputs will drive the + and - inputs of the comparator to achieve better psu noise rejection. Or one output drives a reclocker at raw clock frequency, while the other output is divided down to word clock or whatever. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
|
Certainly! Very interestingly and rather in time!
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Munich
|
Here is the schematic from my working prototype.
Next step is to add more parallel FETs. For conversion to square, I intend to use AD9687 which has ECL outputs. And use ECL as far as possible for the rest of the DAC.
Last edited by Bernhard; 4th November 2009 at 07:12 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Munich
|
Added the AD9687 and it looks very good.
AD9687 with only 2,7 ns propagation delay is much faster than AD8561 that has 7 ns. Last edited by Bernhard; 4th November 2009 at 10:40 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Munich
|
Last edited by Bernhard; 27th November 2009 at 01:16 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
|
Very beautifully Bernhard!
How this beauty influences a sound? As it is beautiful? It is possible to describe in a few words. Judging by frequency it for TDA1541? |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Not very original as Wildmonkeysects already invented it in 2002:
ECL oscillator just won't oscillate Last edited by QSerraTico_Tico; 27th November 2009 at 06:17 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Munich
|
Quote:
Anyway, I did not claim an inventionjust a schematic and he did not invent it either. Coupling caps should be used for exactly 50% duty cycle and referencing the comparator to its own ground pins, not somewhere else. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Munich
|
Quote:
I am listening to the previous version with less ideal grounding and it sounds a bit better than a pair of industrial clocks, however I have no specs or datasheets from manufacturers. The influence on sound... The clock is located inside the DAC and it fixes all the typical degradations caused by SPDIF & bad CD player clocks, for example corrupted tonal balance, irritating sound, lack of precision and separation. I don't like the superlative vocabulary that is used regularly in this place The clock frequency has nothing to do with TDA1541, it is just comfortable to divide down to what my transport expects as word clock. What is important with any clock: The oscillator part must be shielded. Otherwise it will pick up all the noise it can get, you can see it on a spectrum analyzer. Industrial clocks are not put into hermetically sealed metal cases for fun or for the shiny look. There are clock modules offered for audio tuning, that have discrete oscillators on pcbs and no shield. Just forget about it. Last edited by Bernhard; 27th November 2009 at 08:30 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bangkok
|
Thanks for the post.
I wonder what special about this differential clock, compared to popular ones such as KC7 or Tent clocks. I came across some simulation on 3 different clock circuits, published by DeepColor. (PDF) Last edited by bordins; 29th November 2009 at 02:33 AM. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11021 seconds (78.60% PHP - 21.40% MySQL) with 11 queries |