Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Source
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 2nd December 2009, 12:21 PM   #21
diyAudio Member
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Munich
Quote:
Originally Posted by EUVL View Post
I guess you meant AD96687 ....
No, I have the older part AD9687, specs differ only marginally.

Clock with and without shield.
I was lucky to have a transformer cover that fits exactly my oscillator pcb

Click the image to open in full size.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2009, 12:40 PM   #22
diyAudio Member
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Munich
Quote:
Originally Posted by EUVL View Post
Why use 2SK152 instead of other JFETs ?
And why not an extra (JFET) driver stage at the oscillator for the comparator a la Hagclock ?
I have a bunch of sk152, as well as the AD, and it is a RF FET, perhaps others are better ?

Is it necessary to load the oscillator with a very high impedance , the extra buffer stage could add another noise and distortion ?

If you look at the schematic, I use 1 k shunt on the input of the AD, that gave an improvement while the termination of the ECL parts was't optimal.

Now it does not seem to make a difference at all.
But I will do a listening test.

The other option that I will try later, is putting a balanced crystal filter between oscillator and comparator.
Though it looks very clean to me already.

About shielding the clock, left with shield, right without:
Without shield would be even worse if there would not be the groundplane of the motherboard shielding the solder side of the oscillator already.
This is 100 dB displayed. The sidebands are 50 Hz noise obviously.

Click the image to open in full size.

Last edited by Bernhard; 2nd December 2009 at 12:47 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2009, 12:58 PM   #23
diyAudio Member
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Munich
Quote:
Originally Posted by bordins View Post
A friend of mine also explained to me that the differential signal can become a noise generator, into other parts of the circuit.

Can we make PCB trace for the clock output ? Should we choose point-to-point floating cabling instead, like in the products from Audiocom (single-ended, btw).

If so, which cable is appropriate ?
Can you enlighten me why that should happen ?

The setup is differential from oscillator to comparator, differential from comparator to ECL/TTL translator, single ended from ECL/TTL translator to reclocker and divider, the translator has two outputs.

I use SMB connectors between boards everywhere except here, the distance between the oscillator and the comparator is short.

Soon I will test ECL reclocking which means again differential from comparator to ECL flipflop and level translators on input and output.

Final implementation could be ECL clock drivers for the parallel DAC chips.

Last edited by Bernhard; 2nd December 2009 at 01:21 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2009, 01:44 PM   #24
diyAudio Member
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Munich
I had an idea to solve the DIY DAC master - transport slave problem universally.

The clock from the DAC can be transmitted using ECL logic without problems.
On the transport side, a retriggerable monostable multivibrator disables the transport clock for a duration of two or three pulses on every incoming clock pulse.
So there is no problem of running the transport without clock.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2009, 03:10 PM   #25
EUVL is offline EUVL  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
While I admire you beautiful work, I think you would do us a real favour if you could post schematics with available components.
I don't think the 2SK152 is easy to source (obsolete), and I only managed to find out about the AD96687 by accident.
Unless of course you can help us with the sourcing as well .....



Patrick
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2009, 04:31 PM   #26
diyAudio Member
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Munich
AD96687 can be bought from Digikey.com for about 10 $.

The SK152 can be found in old Sony CD players, I think you can use the J309 like in the Kwak Clock instead.
There are other RF FETs too. Like SK120 and SK125, those even seem to be faster.
That could make it necessary to readjust the resistors 910 and 1k that set the supply voltages to about +2,5V and -2,5V.

The blue lines in the schematic that connect the left and right sides are optional and perhaps preferable, my clock has still separate supplies.

I will draw a schematic how to connect the ECL parts later.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2009, 10:48 PM   #27
bordins is offline bordins  Thailand
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bangkok
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bernhard View Post
Can you enlighten me why that should happen ?
My apology. I misunderstood my friend's points.

Bernhard, where did you get the black cover above ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2009, 09:01 AM   #28
qusp is offline qusp  Australia
Sometimes a square peg fits a round hole just fine
diyAudio Member
 
qusp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Bernhard, great work and I must say i'm quite interested. the obscene prices charged for some other discrete clocks is prohibitive, well rather I refuse to pay them. anyway i'm keen, but i'm also quite interested in your teflon PCB, can you enlighten me as to how this process is achieved?? i'm designing a transformer output PCB for my sabre dac using lundahl iron, would love to make the PCB teflon
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2009, 09:02 AM   #29
qusp is offline qusp  Australia
Sometimes a square peg fits a round hole just fine
diyAudio Member
 
qusp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
or is it just as simple as substituting a teflon board??
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th December 2009, 06:40 PM   #30
diyAudio Member
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Munich
Quote:
Originally Posted by bordins View Post
Bernhard, where did you get the black cover above ?
It is from a transformer.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:27 PM.

Page generated in 0.32659 seconds (27.99% PHP - 72.01% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio