|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Articles | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Viña del Mar, Torreon
|
Mlloyd,
Thanks for the reference, I've seen this thread before, but strange I don't see a Joko's full schematic. I wonder if I should use a simpler approach, something like Kuei proposal with the OPA660, but unfortunately I don't have this Opamp. |
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Banned
|
Quote:
One of the first things I did to my Sony was replacing opamps by AD827, 12 years ago! Then I added a discrete output booster. Very simple circuit by Walt Jung using only two transistors. I continued and eventually made a complete discrete opamp. You can use BUF634 but I found it less transparant than a discrete buffer. Interestingly BUF634 is used by Wadia, Madrigal & Linnenberg. Of the list of opamps you mentioned I tried the AD811 as IV-converter only. In my Philips CD-650 I tried the LM6171 too in the original position as IV-converter and outputbuffer. I liked the AD827 more in this player. I have a dislike for the AD825. ![]() AD827 is obsolete now and succeeded by AD826.
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Taipei
|
Quote:
I wonder about the detail of this circuit, please... :>
__________________
Here's looking at you, kid. |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Here's the detail. The other two bypass caps are SMD, Y5U and X7R type, soldered directly to the pins underneath.
__________________
www.audiosector.com “Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
And here's PS, taken from a first Kusunoki DAC. I will be experimenting with different arrangements still. Also the output voltage is reduced to 5V, as it works better.
__________________
www.audiosector.com “Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC |
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Taipei
|
Hello Daniel,
This circuit is simple and pretty, I want to do it somewhen. Thank you very much.
__________________
Here's looking at you, kid. |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Viña del Mar, Torreon
|
Peter,
Thanks for the posted circuits. I understand that the 1543 is considered by Philips as a budget DAC but I wonder if there are some special selections? Heard also you built a multichip version a la Kusunoki but you seem to preffer the single chip? |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Viña del Mar, Torreon
|
I requested some OPA660 to try TL I/V but they are out of stock.
So for the moment I intend to try the AD811 I/V. Could you point me to a circuit using this implementation? Coming back to the CDB650 I can report that with further brake-in the bass is coming in nicely but somewhat rounded at the low end. I also realized that the CDP is inverting so changed polarity to the speaker cables. ---------------------------------------- I noted also on the bass speaker certain low freq movement which is related to the sound but certainly not actual signal. The movement is like what you have on analog with disc wrapage. My first impresion is that it is a PSU voltage IM. |
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Sometimes budget chips are better, because of simpler design. And I found out, that simple circuits usually work better. I tried 4 chips and 2 chips in parallell with different voltages and clearly a single one with 5V supply works best. More resoulution, smoother and relaxed. I also tried Lundahl transformers at the output, but they definitely degraded the sound. A friend of mine tried those transformers at the output of oversampling DAC (SF DAC1) and he was raving about them. Actually I can't complain much about that circuit. It only needs more extention in HF, more soundstage and slightly improved tonal balance. When this is achieved, it will be a very good DAC. I compared it to modified high end one box player (which supposed to be one of the best currently) and this little DAC was still a match. Looking at simlicity and investment, I'd say, it's not bad
__________________
www.audiosector.com “Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Viña del Mar, Torreon
|
Peter, you sold me, I have ordered some 1543.
In the meanwhile I'll continue to play with the 1541, and then compare.
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Back to Back transformers and safety ground | dsavitsk | Tubes / Valves | 1 | 9th February 2009 10:10 PM |
| back to back isolation transformers: | maxlorenz | Parts | 30 | 27th March 2006 03:15 AM |
| Back to Back transformers to get +B of 200V ?? | Shoog | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 23rd September 2005 03:58 AM |
| (Attn Planet 10!) active xo & 2.5 way back to back Vifa P13 mids - questions | paulspencer | Multi-Way | 9 | 15th August 2004 05:34 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11027598 seconds (81.16% PHP - 18.84% MySQL) with 11 queries |