|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
|
Hi All,
Recently I bought a TEAC VRDS-10 and using it as a transport. I am extremely happy with the result of this transport. However I also now have an option to buy a TEAC VRDS 25X. It will cost me a lot more...around $1500. That is thrice the cost I paid for the VRDS-10. But I have heard lot of good things about this player so I thought I may want to give it a try. Also the 25X is a more recent model and is in mint condition so it would hopefully give me longer service. But But But, the milllion dollar question is.......how much better is the 25X as a TRANSPORT compared to the VRDS-10 ?? I know its transport is similar to the VRDS-10 but has some additional mods...now with all that will it be a significant upgrade from the VRDS-10 ? Please do look at the price factor also. I do not want to just go for it for the sake having a newer better model unless it really takes the whole game to a higher level. I was initially thinking of using the VRDS-10 for a couple of years and then as I save some money, I would have tried to go for a newer Esoteric model. But this VRDS 25X is a bit tempting so I thought I would ask people who have more hand on with these machines and only then take a call. Please suggest asap because I have to take this call soon. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
DIY !
diyAudio Member
|
Keep the VRDS-10, add a Tent-clock w/separate psu & reclocking on separate output...and it will be better than a stock 25.
Or go for the 25, and enjoy the better built chassi... Sound or looks...? You choose Arne K
__________________
Ars longa, vita brevis |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
|
But I would still like to know how much am I losing with the VRDS-10 ?
Considering both in Stock form....would the 25X be a significant step up from the 10 in terms of digital output ? |
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
DIY !
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Arne K
__________________
Ars longa, vita brevis |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2006
|
Hello Pani
Are you aware of this article? http://www.lampizator.eu/LAMPIZATOR/...CD_player.html His evaluation and judgement of equipment is first rate. His site can be found at http://www.lampizator.eu/ |
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
|
Quote:
I have read that article before. But if you go by article carefully you may notice that: 1. He does not talk a lot about this player as a standalone transport. He talks about it mostly as a CDP. Obviously that would be his main concern because that is what matters to him and his lapizator mod. 2. He doesnt hold a lot of respect/value for VRDS. He considers it to be yet another decent transport. Now thats not something I would buy after using some very good transports in the recent past with my Reimyo DAC and then discovering how much better the VRDS is compared to others. I do not know what TEAC does and whether VRDS really does any magic but at the end of the day its one hell of a transport. So basically that article does not help me in getting the inputs I am looking at. However good the 25X might be as a standalone CDP really does not matter to me because I am only going to use its transport section. If that is radically better than my VRDS-10 then I would have to think .
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
TEAC VRDS-10 2 x TDA1547 – SAA7350 – SM5840APVRDS CMK-3.2 KSS-151A
TEAC VRDS-10SE 2 x TDA1547 + 2 x SAA7350 - SM5840VRDS CMK-3.2 KSS-151A TEAC VRDS-20 2 x TDA1547 – SAA7350 – SM5840VRDS CMK-3.2 KSS-151A TEAC VRDS-25 4 x AD1862N-J - SM5843 - CXD2545VRDS CMK-3.2 KSS-151A TEAC VRDS-25X / XS 4 x AD1862N-J - SM5843 - CXD2545VRDS CMK-3.2 KSS-151A TEAC VRDS-50NSdap FN1241VRDS CMK-3.2 KSS-151A As you can see everything uses the same CMK3.2 mech and KSS-151A laser. Stick with the 10se that you have, if using it as a transport. Cheers George |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
|
Thanks a lot George, it really helped.
I was of the impression that VRDS-10 had CMK4 mechanism.
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: italia
|
can you explain the difference?
TEAC VRDS-25 4 x AD1862N-J - SM5843 - CXD2545VRDS CMK-3.2 KSS-151A TEAC VRDS-25X / XS 4 x AD1862N-J - SM5843 - CXD2545VRDS CMK-3.2 KSS-151A many thanks in advice |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
|
Hei,
Fant nicket ditt i forbindelse med en VRDS-problemstilling. Kunne jeg få snakke med deg om noe tilsvarende? Ring vær så snill. mvh Knut Selsjord, Oslo 932 56 217 |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| F.S.: Teac VRDS-10 (SE) | Cobra2 | Swap Meet | 5 | 14th November 2011 07:28 AM |
| Teac VRDS-10 help please? | jonners | Digital Source | 18 | 1st February 2009 09:24 PM |
| Help please with Teac VRDS-T1 | georgehifi | Digital Source | 0 | 14th February 2006 02:40 AM |
| TEAC VRDS-10 .. need help ! | picodelle | Digital Source | 2 | 7th November 2005 10:21 PM |
| Teac VRDS-10 vs 10-SE | Cobra2 | Digital Source | 0 | 17th December 2004 08:54 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10115 seconds (83.58% PHP - 16.42% MySQL) with 10 queries |