|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Austria
|
Excuse me for asking so stupid, maybe the answer is writen in my books..... but I donīt want to spend so much time for finding the answer ;-)
the question belongs to the integrated filters in cooleditpro.... (has this anything to do with FIR or IIR - filters.....) thanks, wssi
__________________
regards / servus |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
|
Your topic doesn't exactly match your thread contents. I'll answer the question in the topic title:
Cool edit pro did their FFT transforms (filters/noise reduction) correctly. They do not create phase errors. However, their quick eq option may not. In fact, I found it to be slower than their FFT stuff with 8kpoint FFT conversions. I'm also not sure about their sample rate conversion, I havn't analysed it's performance. Now, it seems you need to read up on FFT/FIR/IIR, here is a good link: http://www.dspguru.com/info/faqs/index.htm -------- Extra: If you use win2k/winxp, look for a copy of Cooledit96. A bug within it makes the real-time FFT analysis & vu meter work really smooth and good. Check out playback with a 1K plot. In win95/win98, it would run at the same speed as the newer cooledits, this is sad and annoying since I need to go to CE96 when I analyse audio to check for cheap thing like compression artifacts, 15Khz leakage usually recieved by microphones or cheap cabling picking up the yoke EM signal from monitors, or 50/60Hz leakage. The newer cooledits really suck here. Does anyone know how to get the new cooledit's spectrum analysis to run like cooledit96's? ---------
__________________
_______ Brian |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Menlo Park, CA
|
Yes, they can. Digital filters can be separated into two categories: "linear phase" and "nonlinear phase".
As their name implies, linear phase filters have a phase response that is a straight line on a linear/linear phase vs. frequency graph. These filters have a constant group delay across all frequencies. (The group delay is basically the slope of the phase response.) However, it is entirely possible to construct a nonlinear phase digital filter, so named because the phase graph is not a straight line. In this case the group delay is not constant across all frequencies. FIR filters can be both linear phase and nonlinear phase. Linear phase FIR filters have a symmetrical impulse response. IIR filters are, except in certain degenerate cases, nonlinear phase.
__________________
Michael |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
|
Quote:
__________________
_______ Brian |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Austria
|
ok, thank you for this, now itīs a little bit clearer for me, but at this time I think Iīve drunk to much to think about it deeper... but itīs a definitive answer to that what Iīam looking for...[well, if that sound confusing to you -> its the easter weekend.... so forgive me....;-)]
cheers!
__________________
regards / servus |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Any new digital filters ? | percy | Digital Source | 17 | 20th July 2008 01:39 AM |
| Why do manufacturers use crappy digital filters? | John007 | Digital Source | 23 | 7th May 2008 07:54 AM |
| Convolving digital filters? | birkinshawc | Digital Source | 4 | 1st April 2005 03:17 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09354 seconds (74.11% PHP - 25.89% MySQL) with 10 queries |