|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: cornwall
|
hi
as ive got my tda1451 dac head on over this last month,and every other mention seems to involve "fakes" i was just curious to see if anyone has ever sat down and listerned/compared the "fakes" to the real thing?? if so i would be intrested to hear there comments on them. obviously everyone would love the real thing,more so the s1 and s2 varients,but thats getting harder by the day,both by silly cost and lack of stock,and then you may always wonder if its original couldnt it be possible with modern advances etc that these fakes may be half decent,or is that just wishful thinking? any input...hard test.infomation??? all the best smithie |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Budapest, Hungary
|
I have some fake TDA1541As and I will to test them using the method described here:
DAC linearity test CD One of my fake chips is shot circuited at one supply pin. In general, fakes were fallen out of the manufacturer's test, were discarded but not crushed. They are faulty or badly out of spec. Some guy collected them from the waste bin in the backyard and tried to make money of them. I don't expect much from my fakes. Why I bought them? Just because I was cheated (and this was an electronic part shop with proper invoice etc., not an online order). I could have brought them back, but my time is more expensive, so I will use them for experiments. |
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester, England
|
Quote:
)What does happen is that normal tda1541/tda1541a get remarked as S1 or S2.
__________________
pure, perfect sound - forever
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: cornwall
|
hi guys
thanks for your replies...youve shed alittle light on the subject,i was under the impressin that someone was churning them out rather then going thro dustbins! shame no one was having a crack at reproducing...still would be avery small market and not worth the effort i guess,unless they charged more then people are for the originals!!! once again thanks for the insight all the best smithie |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I doubt any true fakes of this chip would work at all. There are probably out of spec reject being sold, but I would say actual fakes would be remarked DIP28 chips of a totally different function. Can't say I have come across any myself, but its not unheard of.
Remarked S1s and S2s on the other hand must be almost as common as the real thing on places like eBay. Easy to remark, hard to spot fakes as Philips were so inconsistent with the genuine markings, and they sell for 6 times the price, so plenty of motivation. Anton |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Are these fake? | glen65 | Solid State | 30 | 7th July 2007 04:45 PM |
| Fake | guido | Digital Source | 21 | 9th November 2006 08:10 AM |
| Fake Law Log Pot | DolbyR | Parts | 7 | 17th January 2006 10:55 PM |
| Law fake pot | Nordic | Chip Amps | 10 | 25th November 2005 11:33 AM |
| Quality Control differences = variations in sound quality? | KT | Class D | 0 | 14th November 2004 06:51 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08984 seconds (76.12% PHP - 23.88% MySQL) with 10 queries |