Not being rude etc, just curious, what made you come to the decision the laser is faulty ?
More often the table motor goes giving the same sort of problem.
Have a look at http://www.wagner.net.au/catalogue/ and download #3 (I think thats the one) it has a list of laser assemblies, most with pics of the assy.
Maybe with a chunk of luck you might find one that LOOKS the same.
Maybe even one with similar numbers.
Although it might not be the right part, it might help narrow down manufacturer.
More often the table motor goes giving the same sort of problem.
Have a look at http://www.wagner.net.au/catalogue/ and download #3 (I think thats the one) it has a list of laser assemblies, most with pics of the assy.
Maybe with a chunk of luck you might find one that LOOKS the same.
Maybe even one with similar numbers.
Although it might not be the right part, it might help narrow down manufacturer.
From the Stereophile review
What seems to have changed Michaelson's mind was the format's rapid acceptance among audiophiles, the availability of reasonably priced OEM chip and transport sets (the Tri-Vista's transport is from Philips), and the company's belief that it had come up with a way to offer SACD without compromising CD performance. Musical Fidelity boasts that the Tri-Vista's CD performance is actually superior to that of the Nu-Vista 3D. It ought to be: at $6495, the new player costs $2000 more than the 3D. And however good the Tri-Vista is, it is not a universal player: It can't play DVD-Audio discs or output multichannel sound from SACDs.
http://www.stereophile.com/hirezplayers/838/index1.html
Andy
What seems to have changed Michaelson's mind was the format's rapid acceptance among audiophiles, the availability of reasonably priced OEM chip and transport sets (the Tri-Vista's transport is from Philips), and the company's belief that it had come up with a way to offer SACD without compromising CD performance. Musical Fidelity boasts that the Tri-Vista's CD performance is actually superior to that of the Nu-Vista 3D. It ought to be: at $6495, the new player costs $2000 more than the 3D. And however good the Tri-Vista is, it is not a universal player: It can't play DVD-Audio discs or output multichannel sound from SACDs.
http://www.stereophile.com/hirezplayers/838/index1.html
Andy
wow thanks for the links guys.. i think i've found the part number in the wagnet.net site.. thanks Madnutt..
VAL6011
VAL6011
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
The Trivista was a lemon from the word go, it's transport had a decoder board that was doomed from the first time it was switched on, the more it was played the more corrupted it became until gave out all together, this is all well documented as the Phillips SACD-1000 was also in the same boat, as was the Krell sacd player and one or two others of the same era.
Phillips have stopped all support for this sacd transport and don't even admit it existed, as it was such a lemon it is not repairable, even with a new decoder board instaled, it was just a matter of time before it started to get corrupted again. Even Alex Peychev a wiz with these transports could not stop the rot even with his cap mods to the decoder board.
http://www.aplhifi.com/SACD1000fix.html
Cheers George
Phillips have stopped all support for this sacd transport and don't even admit it existed, as it was such a lemon it is not repairable, even with a new decoder board instaled, it was just a matter of time before it started to get corrupted again. Even Alex Peychev a wiz with these transports could not stop the rot even with his cap mods to the decoder board.
http://www.aplhifi.com/SACD1000fix.html
Cheers George
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Source & Line
- Digital Source
- MF Tri-Vista Lens Identification