|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
__________________
www.kta-hifi.net |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Utrecht
|
Thanks Kevin,
I will sure check out these chips. Is parallelling still beneficial/necessary? |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
I am actually running a pair of PCM1798 in mono mode with the L and R outputs connected in parallel. (If you do this remember to reverse the connections on one channel as TI designed them to swap when mono mode is invoked.) Each time you double the number of dacs in parallel you get a 3dB improvement in noise performance and linearity, but you rapidly reach the point of diminishing returns - doing this makes the most sense if you are using passive I/V conversion as it results in higher output voltages for a given I/V resistor, and therefore a lower source impedance for a given output level.. I prefer some sort of active I/V conversion in most cases or very small resistors for I/V conversion with a high quality gain stage to make up the lost gain.
__________________
www.kta-hifi.net |
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
- You can get TDA1543 chips cheaply (~US$2.00 each). - These chips parallel very well. Almost every DAC chip will benefit somewhat from being paralleled, but the TDA1543 benefits a huge amount, and make for a good DAC. A single TDA1543 is no much good in my opinion. - There are not the many external components to a TDA1543, and the chip comes in DIP package, so it is easy to build on of these using prototype board. So again, it is cheap. And have DAC chips increased in quality since 1991? Of course. Better chips have come along, such as the mentioned PCM1794 and WM8740. However, a lot of the 'progress' has been focused on making the DACs cheaper, not better (see bitstream). Almost any DAC is going to be better than the walkman's. I suggested the TDA1543 as it is cheap and easy, sounds reasonably good, and will make an excellent first project. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dublin
|
Hey DocLorren,
Good project - I have an old discman and I have a number of TDA1543 DACs all of which is just waiting for a project. Could I get the Service Manual from you, please? There's also a TDA1387 DAC which is a TDA1545 but will accept I2S |
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
RS-232 will not be fast enough.. RS422 should be ok with the I2S for clocks of less than 10MHz, but may be getting marginal above this, RS-485 is faster still.. Note that you could just use the DB9 connectors without any drivers with coax, but the distances with I2S need to be very short. I had pretty serious malfunctions in my dac when I had I2S lines longer than 15cm or so.. Incidentally the MAXIM parts cited in the above post are far too slow, topping out at 120kbits per second. You need something 100X faster to do this job depending on mclk (sclk) speed.
__________________
www.kta-hifi.net |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Utrecht
|
Ok guys, thanks for your input so far, I think I know which direction to take from here (internal DAC, starting with parallelled TDA1543s). Projected costs for a (hopefully) good sounding micro CD-player:
Discman: 15 euros on Ebay (adapter included, to be transformed into internal PSU) Internal I2S DAC: 30 euros (less if PSU from Discman can be used) Hammond casing: 20 euros Connectors, switches etc: 20 euros Mistakes (definition will follow after build): 15 euros Total: 100 euros Funfactor: priceless...again Just a few more questions (especially directed at Anton now that you have read the SM): can the RAM controller be bypassed without trouble? What IF I want to experiment with regular external DACs (optical or coaxial coupled). What would be the best/simplest solution to convert an I2S signal into SPDIF? I do not think I will follow this route but it might be interesting anyway. @JKeny: Which model do you have? My SM is covering the D-E44x line. Drop me an email. |
|
|
|
|
#29 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
|
The internal DAC sounds like a great idea. You definitely should bypass the ram controller.
Quote:
There is no easy way to get a SPDIF out, it will require an extra IC, something like a CS8406. Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hang on, on further inspection of the service manual, the transport DC supply should be 4.5VDC to the charge port.
Anton |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Discman - DACs and OP-AMPs | percy | Digital Source | 0 | 24th May 2005 03:53 PM |
| discman car conexion digital noise | mbahi | Car Audio | 1 | 1st June 2004 11:32 PM |
| low jittering a discman ? | mekanoplastik | Digital Source | 5 | 31st December 2003 04:17 PM |
| Car Audio Suitable Preamp for Discman | ssertoglu | Car Audio | 4 | 9th June 2003 10:19 PM |
| digital audio interface inside a discman | takashi | Digital Source | 2 | 4th March 2003 03:22 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13621 seconds (82.72% PHP - 17.28% MySQL) with 11 queries |