|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
|
I know there were endless posts on these pages regarding usfulness of super (descrete) regulators in digital circuits and their possible advantages over standrad LM78xx chips.
I know that good old 78xx are not made for audio but how about using some more modern regulators. What are people opinions on lets say LM2940 or LM1086. Or is there any other better alternative for regulating digital 5V supply that does not cost 30euro a piece? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Central Ohio
|
You can use 78xx for digital. Use some good bypass capacitors.
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
Quote:
Also, Martin Clark suggested the pre-tracker, found in LM317's datasheet: - Ref 1 - Ref 2 I've used this pre-tracking regulator with success, but only for "higher" voltages (+/- 15VDC). Not sure how well it'll perform at 5VDC. Also be aware that you can do quite a lot of tweakling to these regulator ckts afterwards, like snubbering. In DIY, you'll never get bored! |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Well, I tried those: LM317, LM2937, LT1086, LT1129 in CDT prototype and LM7808 was actually the best: http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...36#post1468036
__________________
www.audiosector.com “Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
Quote:
The LT's and some low-dropouts are $$ and often claimed to be noisier. Is this what you found? |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
No, I wasn't concentrating on the noise; they just didn't sound as good.
__________________
www.audiosector.com “Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC |
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
In fact, if you try to order LM7815 from DigiKey, only LM340 comes out.
__________________
www.audiosector.com “Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
Quote:
IAC, my LM340-T5 looks like CalosFM's image capture of this reg. in this post. It is different from any 7805 I'm using or have ever used -- both in external labeling and performance. I got mine from Digi-Key. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
|
Just to summarize (if I can) as far as the price/performance ratio is concerned good old 78xx are as good as it gets.
The only step-up from there would be some of the super-regulator varieties. However, if I can remeber old posts there were some suggestions that super regs have more or less the same noise levels at high frequencies as the 78xx and that for digital regulation they are waste of money. Does that stand or someone has different experiences? Reragding the 78xx vs LM340T - they are on the same family spec sheet but the performance is smidgen different ; 40uV vs 50uV voltage noise and a bit better regulation on the LM340 side. http://www.farnell.com/datasheets/64424.pdf |
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
www.audiosector.com “Do something really well. See how much time it takes. It might be a product, a work of art, who knows? Then give it away cheaply, just because you feel that it should not cost so much, even if it took a lot of time and expensive materials to make it.” - JC |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| “Ideal” power/regulation for higher-current digital-section ICs | hollowman | Digital Source | 0 | 8th April 2008 04:07 AM |
| Decoupling caps-Alternatives to tantalum capacitors in digital circuits? | Dr.H | Digital Source | 20 | 21st February 2005 05:01 PM |
| Capacitors for digital circuits- Tants vs electrolytics | Dr.H | Digital Source | 7 | 12th February 2003 03:21 PM |
| Sulzer Regulators vs LT1085 in digital circuits | Dr.H | Digital Source | 0 | 29th July 2002 05:56 AM |
| Regulators for digital circuits | Peter Daniel | Digital Source | 49 | 5th July 2002 10:58 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11257 seconds (79.83% PHP - 20.17% MySQL) with 10 queries |