Diy professional DAC & questions on word clock - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Source

Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15th March 2008, 10:17 PM   #1
NeoY2k is offline NeoY2k  France
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Default Diy professional DAC & questions on word clock

Hi everybody
I'm a student in sound engineering, and prior was a student in electronics and industrial IT.
I plan to design a full digital audio system, from ADC to DAC. But I still lack knowledge, and I have some questions to ask to you.

My goal is to make a professional system, not an audiophile system.

So here we start!

One of the main problems with digital audio is the jitter of the clock. A DAC could be designed to try to solve this problem, using the well-known topology:

In->Receiver->ASRC->oversampling->FIR ->DAC->IV->analog filter -> out

This is quite complex because we try to cancel the jitter. We have to build a good quality clock inside each element we will use (ie inside the DAC, ADC, and interface). And ASRC is not a "magical chip".

My idea is that we are in the professinal field. So why not buy a good quality word clock and stop using seperate clocks? This is probably the way to the lowest jitter, and keeping prices down - a clock in each element is expensive, if we don't need them, just don't buy them....

I read many topics on transport, I think I'll go with Toslink as jitter on optical links are the easiest to get rid of.

The topology should then be:
In->Receiver->oversampling->FIR->DAC->IV->filter->out.

Then it becomes harder!

Let's use a PLL on the receiver, as I don't want it to add it's own jitter: it should then clock data out at the same rate as the data comes in. I fear of clocking it directly with the word clock, but maybe I'm wrong?

Let's clock the Oversampling and the DAC to the word clock.

What is exactly the frequency given by the word clock? Because it's not the word clock that I need now - it's the bit clock, that depends on the resolution and the oversampling (and of course the sample rate).

How to get this bit clock?

Let's start with these questions, when I'll have solved them I'll go to the next ones

Thank you very much,
Nicolas
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2008, 03:29 PM   #2
NeoY2k is offline NeoY2k  France
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Ok some news!
I slept a bit, and thought a bit too.

I now know the typology I want to use:

In->Wolfson SPDIF receiver -> buffer - oversampling -> FIR ->Wolfson WM8740 DAC->buffer- filter->out

The SPDIF receiver just locks itself on the incoming signal frequency. It outputs data at a fs*nb of bits rate. I don't care of the recovered frequency output.

We have some jitter now

Feed it to the FIFO buffer. I'll try to use a large one, even if it should not be necessary as the transport and the DAC system are on the same external master clock.

Then we have the problem of oversampling.

I'm wondering: interpolation or no interpolation? Just clock the output of the buffer at OS*nb of bits*signal freq?
Interpolation is done with an ASRC... Most people suggest not to use it. In fact, smoothing the signal will be done by the output filter so... It's probably better not using it. And it keeps design simpler. Any suggestion?

The other question is: how to make this bit clock.

Make a DIY master clock from synchronous dividers from a high frequency XO, that would output synchronously the word clock and this clock?

Use a PLL frequency mutliplier to recover this bit clock from the word clock? This is the only way to use standard word clock - even if some very expensive ones generate these clocks.

But what about the jitter of this PLL frequency multiplier? I'm not very confident about the jitter of a 24(bits)*8 (oversampling)*44.1 (khz) clock recovered from a simple 44.1 kHz clock....

Maybe may I use a switch to switch between this PLL for use with standard word clocks, and a second input for this high frequency clock.

But if I transmit a 192kHZ audio signal, it leads to a 36, 864 Mhz clock - transmitting this clock on a BNC Coax without jitter doesn't seem very secure.

Wich one leads to the smallest jitter? Recovered clock via a frequency mutiplier PLL or transmitting a high frequency clock?

Thank you very much,
Nicolas
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tri Vista 21 word clock racerxnet Digital Line Level 2 18th May 2009 12:20 PM
CDPro 2 with word clock in ackcheng Digital Source 1 12th November 2005 04:07 PM
CD Player with a WORD CLOCK out? JP Audiophile Digital Source 0 3rd August 2005 03:26 PM
CS8412, PMD100, PCM63, onboard clock + [word] clock output implementation stolbovoy Digital Source 7 3rd December 2004 07:18 PM
Word Clock Generator fmak Digital Source 1 5th July 2003 01:41 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:05 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2