|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I have a few lathed cd's that sound different to none lathed versions of the same disc, all new purchased discs..
now i don't believe for one minute that as the manufacturer claims it's to do with laser scatter or other eroneous ********. but i can't deny the differnece in sound. so. based on the fact that all it does is trim the disc to give you a better balanced cd that spins with less potential vibration. how does this chnage interact with the mechanism in the cd mech that serve to allow better disc tracking and error correction when apit can't be read? do the electrical component of the laser assembly exist in perfect electrical isolation from the rest of the system, or not? if not how can any feedback manifest itself in reduced sound quality? does reed solomon actually produce the 'lost bit' or does it just provide an approximation, and if so how close is this approximation. also does invoking reed solomon has any effect on data stream jitter? please help, i'dloveto have an understanding of why a lathed cd sounds more spacious and ambient in my set up. i can pick the lathed version of several discs out over the none lathed version with 100% accuracy so i'm not just fooling myself into hearing a difference.
__________________
hoping to pick up some things. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
come on someone....
__________________
hoping to pick up some things. |
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Belgium
|
Quote:
Beyond this data are interpolated. Such interpolation only happens once in a while with an average disk. Quote:
__________________
bring back dynamic range |
||
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
thank you.
so any change can only be down to reduced electrical activity in the servo via a potentially better balanced disc?
__________________
hoping to pick up some things. |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sofia
|
Quote:
Maybe. It may also have something to do with the effect of pit jitter. |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New error correction amp | PMA | Solid State | 101 | 3rd January 2011 11:00 PM |
| Re: New error correction amp | mefistofelez | Solid State | 12 | 7th October 2010 06:55 AM |
| Will this work as Error Correction? | lumanauw | Solid State | 4 | 8th October 2004 10:52 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08279 seconds (74.16% PHP - 25.84% MySQL) with 10 queries |