|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Articles | Links | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
We're saving for a new server - help us to serve you by Donating Today and become a friend with benefits!
Ads on/off / Custom Title / 2009 Tshirt / More PMs / Bigger Images / Advanced printing |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi Guys!
I have an idea to make a fully balanced TDA1541A DAC. It could works? Thx! |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
Yes it would work but you would not get the really cool benefits of running it balanced.
So use this instead: http://www.pedjarogic.com/1541a/I2Sbal_split.htm |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Thanks Tazz for the comment...
...but I really don't see why better the Pedja's method? Maybe the channel separation is better, but at my idea, the RCA and XLR outputs are simply to operate. What do you think? Why isn't good this method than Pedja's? |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Perhaps the phase inverter would be more simple than i2s splitter...
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
You could read the threads about how to decouple the tda1541a lots of pointers there.
For one thing running one dac differential would make the complimentary audiocurrents flowing trough Va+ constant, wich would be most desireable. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grenoble, FR
|
the way the 1541 is built, the AC current going to the supply pin is the same as the current in both outputs
so if you have a classical L/R implementation, it's just 2 separate channels on the other hand, if you have L+/L-, the AC supply current becomes (L-)+(L+) so L-L=0 you get only (or almost) a DC supply current to the chip, making the regulation, decoupling, PSSR, problems almost disappear
__________________
Just remember: in theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice it usually is quite a bit difference... Bob Pease |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: GuangDong China
|
the best way is to make a glue logic for working in sim' mode of TDA1541, like this by CPLD:
http://www.cdream5.com/htm/blance_dac1541A.htm http://www.cdream5.com/htm/I2S_MK.htm |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: whereisit
|
I have always wondered, why not use sign magnitude loading with dual dac like TDA?
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grenoble, FR
|
Quote:
why is it better?
__________________
Just remember: in theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice it usually is quite a bit difference... Bob Pease |
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SE to Balanced tube preamp idea | hollow_man | Tubes / Valves | 33 | 1st October 2009 07:44 PM |
| First Watt balanced gainclone idea | mikelm | Chip Amps | 36 | 9th August 2008 04:26 AM |
| Balanced compound-IGBT power amp idea | revintage | Solid State | 10 | 21st January 2008 05:27 PM |
| idea of a cost-no-subject, fully hornloaded speaker | angeloitacare | Multi-Way | 11 | 23rd April 2007 12:37 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.20014310 seconds (71.05% PHP - 28.95% MySQL) with 11 queries |