|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hello, folks.
I just used the TSP (time stretched pulse) technique to measure the transfer function of an external Sound Blaster Audigy NX2 sound board. See how ugly! there is a hole around 10kHz. Lucky I barely listen that high
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
This is the impulse response (in time...)
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..
|
seems extreme, did you try the free RMAA to doublecheck?
http://audio.rightmark.org/products/rmaa.shtml this collection of tests is getting pretty dated but even these older cards don't show 5 dB holes http://www.pcavtech.com/soundcards/compare/index.htm used old RMAA too, now the RMAA frequency plot is denser, plotted as a cont line |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I use Linux...
It would be nice if someone could tell me if their boards have something like a -5db hole around 10kHz... I was a bit surprised by it too ![]() Here is a log-log plot of the transfer function. Looks less ugly like this...
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..
|
easy to check a few sine tones in Audacity to find such a deep hole, also fft of white niose should work
http://audacity.sourceforge.net/ |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Edmonton area, Alberta
|
I use the Rightmark Audio Analyzer. It's great.
On a related note the E-MU 0202 USB preforms incredibly well, better than specified. |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Since you guys seem to like this old-fashioned noise stuff, here is the result of a measurement using white gaussian noise!...
Yes, it seems the gap is still there... Tough it looks more narrow and smaller. But I would bet this is due the imperfection of using noise. TSP is much nicer! I don't know what can be wrong in this board. I probably should tear it up and see if there aren't any strange capacitances. ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Here I am again... Guess what, nobody killed the charade!
Yes, the strange hole was probably caused by the shitty connector I was using to make the loop. I connected through a small amp I made, and now the response looks better. Now it only has a small inclination, and that ripple... Still not sure what is caused by my amp, by my measurement technique (TSP) and what is due to the board itself. But looks pretty now!
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
New improved impulse response...
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Sorry if the incremental postings is annoying...
Well, this time I used just a single jack-RCA cable, and a small RCA-jack conversor. The ripples in the previous graph are because that plot was from the DFT of the truncated impulse response. This plot here is truncating the impulse response after much more samples. This is not "realistic", but gets a better estimate of the true transfer function... Has to do with handling noise, and stuff, I don't know exactly. If you consider all samples, your transfer function looks noisy. If you cut it short, you get that ripples. This image here was from a response truncated at around 1900 samples. The original TSP I used had 2**12 (4k) samples, so this is like an intermediary choice... There is a little noise in the low frequencies, but the ripple from the truncation is very weak. There is still a little ripple in the estimated TF tough, and now I'm inclined to believe that this is a true ripple from the board's filters. The green curve is the same one in "centibels". Does anybody know what kind of filter should I expect? I could believe this is a 15-order Chebyshev, but I don't have experience with such large order analog filters... Is this feasible? My next post will probably be from a measurement of the filter of the output of my electric guitar! =) |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Transfer function. Poles not where expected | Raka | Multi-Way | 35 | 29th July 2008 01:20 PM |
| transfer function | jenks | Solid State | 31 | 24th April 2008 08:28 PM |
| Experience on measuring sound cad transfer function? | NIC1138 | Digital Source | 1 | 7th June 2007 02:09 AM |
| Transfer Function | jclouse | Multi-Way | 22 | 1st July 2006 01:19 PM |
| Transfer function of closed box | cm961 | Multi-Way | 1 | 31st August 2004 06:42 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |